Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jun;34(6):547-51.
doi: 10.1002/pd.4346. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

Induction of labor compared to dilation and evacuation for postmortem analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Induction of labor compared to dilation and evacuation for postmortem analysis

A K Lal et al. Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the ability to obtain autopsy and cytogenetics after midtrimester termination.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of women undergoing termination, via induction or dilation and evacuation (D&E), at 16 0/7-23 6/7 weeks was performed. Exclusion criteria were elective termination, preterm labor, PPROM, and no autopsy or cytogenetic exam performed. The ability to obtain cytogenetics and autopsy as well as complications rates were compared between the two groups with Chi-square tests.

Results: Of the 469 women who met the inclusion criteria, 158 had an induction and 312 had a D&E. The induction of labor group had higher mean gestational ages, p < 0.01. Successful autopsy was more likely in the induction group, 94.3%, versus D&E group, 34.7%, p = 0.01. There was no difference in ability to obtain cytogenetics between the two groups, 89.1% in the induction group, and 92.3% in D&E group, p = 0.4. There was a difference in the total complication rates between the groups, 9.8% (26) in the induction versus 6.4% (20) in the D&E group, p < 0.01; however, there was no difference in major complications.

Conclusions: Midtrimester terminations by induction were more likely to have successful autopsies when compared with D&E. The ability to obtain cytogenetics was similar regardless of termination mode.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patients included in the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalter H, Warkany J. Medical progress. Congenital malformations: etiologic factors and their role in prevention (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1983;308:424–431. - PubMed
    1. D'Ottavio G, Mandruzzato G, Meir YJ, et al. Comparisons of first and second trimester screening for fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Jun 18. 1998;847:200–9. - PubMed
    1. MacDorman MF, Munson ML, Kirmeyer S. Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56:1–19. - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Zhang XH, Wang JL, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of 355 cases of fetal loss in different trimesters. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:152–8. - PubMed
    1. Kyle PM, Sepulveda W, Blunt S, et al. High Failure Rate of Postmortem karyotyping after termination for fetal abnormality. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:859–62. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms