Independent predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a single center experience
- PMID: 24578855
- PMCID: PMC3921706
- DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2011.01.art4
Independent predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a single center experience
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of study was to establish pretreatment and postoperative factors which could predict the early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Materials and method: 754 patients had undergone radical prostatectomy since January 2002 to December 2008 in our department and were included in this prospective study. Exclusion criteria were: neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment (radiation or hormonal treatment) and N+. Following parameters were evaluated: age, PSA at time of biopsy, time period from biopsy to operation, biopsy and postoperative Gleason score, stage, high grade intraepithelial neoplasias, perineural invasion. Biochemical recurrence was detected if PSA value after radical prostatectomy was ≥0.2 ng/ml. All factors likely to be predictive were evaluated by univariate analysis (Log-rank test). Multivariate analysis using Cox model was completed for all factors with p value <0.1 at univariate analysis.
Results: Final analysis was done using data of 496 patients. We detected 53 (10.7%) biochemical recurrences. Calculated actuarial biochemical recurrence free survival reached 64%. Multivariate analysis highlighted that PSA >10 ng/ml (HR 2.45, p = 0.008), pathological stage ≥pT3 (HR 2.371, p = 0.02), postoperative Gleason score ≥7 (HR 2.149, p = 0.049), positive surgical margins (HR 2.482, p = 0.014) and absence of high grade intraepithelial neoplasia in removed prostate (HR 0.358, p = 0.006) are independent factors influencing biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Conclusion: Patients with higher PSA, locally advanced disease, positive surgical margins, and Gleason score ≥7 are at the highest risk for biochemical recurrence.
Keywords: biochemical recurrence; prostate; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):110-5. J Urol. 2002. PMID: 12050502
-
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 20883488
-
[Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Implications of adjuvant treatment].Arch Esp Urol. 2012 Jan-Feb;65(1):158-65. Arch Esp Urol. 2012. PMID: 22318186 Spanish.
-
The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;25(2):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01561-4. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31673831
-
Enhancing the efficacy of radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer.Urol Int. 1998;60 Suppl 2:2-10; discussion 35. doi: 10.1159/000056545. Urol Int. 1998. PMID: 9607552 Review.
Cited by
-
The Perineural Invasion Paradox: Is Perineural Invasion an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Biochemical Recurrence Risk in Patients With pT2N0R0 Prostate Cancer? A Multi-Institutional Study.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 19;4(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.006. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30706016 Free PMC article.
-
Significance of Time Until PSA Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Without Neo- or Adjuvant Treatment to Clinical Progression and Cancer-Related Death in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 22;9:1286. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01286. eCollection 2019. Front Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31824859 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chun FK, Graefen M, Zacharias M, et al. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy long term recurrence free survival rates for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2006;24:273–280. - PubMed
-
- Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172(3):910–914. - PubMed
-
- Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281:1591–1597. - PubMed
-
- Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007;177(2):540–545. - PubMed
-
- Weber BA, Roberts BL, Mills TL, et al. Physical and emotional predictors of depression after radical prostatectomy. Am J Mens Health. 2008;2(2):165–171. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous