Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;65(3):124-9.
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.03.art5. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

A single institution study on patient's self-reporting appraisal and functional outcomes of the first set of men following radical perineal prostatectomy

Stanisław Wroński  1 , Piotr Słupski  1 , Przemysław Wiśniewski  1
Affiliations

A single institution study on patient's self-reporting appraisal and functional outcomes of the first set of men following radical perineal prostatectomy

Stanisław Wroński et al. Cent European J Urol. 2012.

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluates the functional outcomes and satisfaction of an initial series of 47 patients after radical perineal prostatectomy performed in our department.

Material and methods: The first set of 47 consecutive patients underwent perineal prostatectomy during 2008 and 2009. Continence, sexual outcomes, and satisfaction of the treatment were evaluated using a self-reporting questionnaire, which was mailed to all patients after 15 to 33 months of follow-up. 26 patients (55.3%) returned a completed form and participated in the study. Additionally, final outcomes were compared to results reported elsewhere.

Results: Amid respondents, 91.7% were satisfied with the chosen treatment and 8.3% regret the previous decision. 38.5% patients reported any urine leakage, 15.4% drip up to 100 ml a day, and only one patient (3.8%) was totally incontinent. 76.9% men report a decline in prior sexual function. Six patients (23.1%) patients have any degree of spontaneous erections and undertake sexual activity. However, as erectile outcomes are adjusted to nine nerve-sparing cases, 66.7% have spontaneous erections and 55.5% undertake sexual activity, but only 40% of them describe their sexual function as satisfying.

Conclusions: Our survey demonstrates that, because of short operating time, fast recovery, low postoperative pain score, early patient mobilization and feeding, and a small (8-10 cm) and inconspicuous skin incision, radical perineal prostatectomy fully deserves to be recognized as a low-morbidity procedure. The perineal approach provides a quality of life and patients satisfaction rate comparable to trendy, highly equipped procedures and emerges as an attractive alternative to them. Even novice "perineal surgeons" may achieve favorable results.

Keywords: functional outcomes; radical perineal prostatectomy; radical prostatectomy; satisfaction with treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hu JC, Wang Q, Pachos CL, et al. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;28:2278–2284. - PubMed
    1. Cooperberg MR, Odisho AY, Carroll PR. Outcomes for radical prostatectomy: is it the singer, the song, or both? J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:476–478. - PubMed
    1. Mulhall JP, Rojaz-Cruz C, Müller A. An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites. BJU Int. 2010;105:68–72. - PubMed
    1. Lepor H. Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach? Rev Urol. 2009;11:61–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, et al. Open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: The European and US experience. Rev Urol. 2010;12:35–43. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources