Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals
- PMID: 24581635
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031
Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals
Abstract
Objective: To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty.
Design: A cross-sectional survey.
Participants: 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals.
Main outcome measures: Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR.
Results: Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained 'uncertain' and 6% felt 'different but not improved.' Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between 'good' to 'fair' (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as 'unchanged', while 3% reported a 'worsened' appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.
Conclusions: Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.
Keywords: Aesthetic; Cleft-lip nasal deformity; Perception; Rhinoplasty; Satisfaction.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Panel and patient perceptions of nasal aesthetics after secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without columellar grafting.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;39(5):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Sep 15. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011. PMID: 20832328
-
Secondary cleft nose rhinoplasty: Subjective and objective outcome evaluation.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;43(9):1855-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Aug 29. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015. PMID: 26412642
-
High patient satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip patients.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 May-Jun;1(3):167-72. doi: 10.1002/alr.20023. Epub 2011 Apr 28. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011. PMID: 22287367
-
Rhinoplasty in Clefts: An 18-Year Retrospective Review.Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;31(5):539-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564718. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Facial Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 26579870 Review.
-
Cleft-related nose deformation evaluation and measurement methods. Literature review.Stomatologija. 2015;17(3):75-83. Stomatologija. 2015. PMID: 26879399 Review.
Cited by
-
A Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Instrument for Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty: The RHINO Scale.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Feb 4;4(2):e611. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000592. eCollection 2016 Feb. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016. PMID: 27014540 Free PMC article.
-
Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;20(2):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s10006-016-0555-4. Epub 2016 Apr 22. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27106142
-
Optimizing precision rhinoplasty: comprehensive preoperative planning with nasal computed tomography for functional and aesthetic enhancement.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 25;46(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00423-y. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 38526691 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Routine Prospective Functional and Aesthetic Patient Satisfaction Measurements in Secondary Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty.JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Dec 1;20(6):488-494. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0876. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 30326520 Free PMC article.
-
Aesthetics Assessment and Patient Reported Outcome of Nasolabial Aesthetics in 18-Year-Old Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Sep;56(8):1058-1064. doi: 10.1177/1055665619832439. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019. PMID: 30808197 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources