Surgical, oncologic, and cosmetic differences between oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients
- PMID: 24581764
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.017
Surgical, oncologic, and cosmetic differences between oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of information regarding the safety, complication rate, and cosmetic outcome of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare oncoplastic and nononcoplastic procedures.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated with oncoplastic or nononcoplastic lumpectomies. Immediate and long-term complication rates and cosmetic satisfaction were compared.
Results: Of the 142 surgeries, 58 were oncoplastic lumpectomies (40.8%). Oncoplastic patients were younger than nononcoplastic patients (60.9 vs 65.2 years, P = .043). Immediate complications were similar with the exception of nonhealing wounds (oncoplastic = 8.6% vs nononcoplastic = 1.2%, P = .042). Cosmetic complaints were similar, but fat necrosis was more common in the oncoplastic group (25.9% vs 9.5%, P = .009). Time to radiation and number of future biopsies were similar between the groups.
Conclusion: Oncoplastic lumpectomy is a safe alternative to standard lumpectomy for selected breast cancer patients.
Keywords: Breast; Complication; Long term; Lumpectomy; Oncoplasty; Short term.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Oncoplastic surgery: fashion or necessity?Am J Surg. 2015 Jul;210(1):199. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.042. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Am J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25892598 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Oncological advantages of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in treatment of early breast cancer.Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):56-63. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12047. Breast J. 2013. PMID: 23301761
-
Optimizing delivery of breast conservation therapy: a multidisciplinary approach to oncoplastic surgery.Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Sep;69(3):250-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822afa99. Ann Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 21862918
-
The influence of simultaneous integrated boost, hypofractionation and oncoplastic surgery on cosmetic outcome and PROMs after breast conserving therapy.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;41(10):1411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 31. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26260375
-
Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery: the new paradigm.J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;110(1):82-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.23641. Epub 2014 May 22. J Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24847860 Review.
-
[Oncoplastic breast surgery in Denmark].Ugeskr Laeger. 2013 Nov 25;175(48A):V06130376. Ugeskr Laeger. 2013. PMID: 25353190 Review. Danish.
Cited by
-
Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jun 23;56:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.016. eCollection 2020 Aug. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32637082 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Complications after Oncoplastic Breast Reduction and Impact on Time to Adjuvant Therapy.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 30;12(7):e6010. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006010. eCollection 2024 Jul. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39081812 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-Layer Rotation: A Versatile Therapeutic Mammoplasty Technique.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(11):6716-6727. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11977-4. Epub 2022 Jun 16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35711016 Free PMC article.
-
Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: a comparative retrospective study.ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1236-1241. doi: 10.1111/ans.15245. Epub 2019 Apr 16. ANZ J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30990940 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing outcomes of single-port insufflation endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and conventional open approach for breast cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 6;20(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02798-6. World J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36203177 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical