Nonsurgical interventions after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
- PMID: 24581911
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.009
Nonsurgical interventions after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize the best available evidence regarding the impact of nonsurgical interventions on persistent symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).
Data sources: MEDLINE and other databases were searched (2001-2012) with terms including "rehabilitation." Inclusion criteria were original, peer-reviewed research published in English and other languages. References were also identified from the bibliographies of eligible articles.
Study selection: Controlled trials and cohort and case-control studies were selected according to predefined criteria. Studies had to have a minimum of 30 MTBI cases and assess nonsurgical interventions using clinically relevant outcomes such as self-rated recovery.
Data extraction: Eligible studies were critically appraised using a modification of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Two reviewers independently reviewed each study and extracted data from the admissible studies into evidence tables.
Data synthesis: The evidence was synthesized qualitatively according to the modified SIGN criteria. Recommendations were linked to the evidence tables using a best-evidence synthesis. After 77,914 records were screened, only 2 of 7 studies related to nonsurgical interventions were found to have a low risk of bias. One studied the effect of a scheduled telephone intervention offering counseling and education on outcome and found a significantly better outcome for symptoms (6.6 difference in adjusted mean symptom score; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-12.0), but no difference in general health outcome at 6 months after MTBI. The other was a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of 6 days of bed rest on posttraumatic complaints 6 months postinjury, compared with no bed rest, and found no effect.
Conclusions: Some evidence suggests that early, reassuring educational information is beneficial after MTBI. Well-designed intervention studies are required to develop effective treatments and improve outcomes for adults and children at risk for persistent symptoms after MTBI.
Keywords: Craniocerebral trauma; Post-concussion syndrome; Rehabilitation; Review, systematic.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review of the prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in adults: cognitive, psychiatric, and mortality outcomes: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S152-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.300. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24581903
-
Systematic review of the risk of dementia and chronic cognitive impairment after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S245-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.036. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24581910
-
Systematic review of return to work after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.010. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24581906
-
Psychosocial consequences of mild traumatic brain injury in children: results of a systematic review by the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.018. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24581905
-
Systematic review of the clinical course, natural history, and prognosis for pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S174-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.301. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24581904
Cited by
-
Predictors for Psychological Distress 2 Months After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Front Neurol. 2019 Jun 18;10:639. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00639. eCollection 2019. Front Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31275230 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors for persistent symptoms in adults with mild traumatic brain injury: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;10(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01810-6. Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34556172 Free PMC article.
-
Neuroplastic Effects in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury After Music-Supported Therapy.Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 25;13:177. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00177. eCollection 2019. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31293405 Free PMC article.
-
The role of early intervention in improving the level of activities and participation in youths after mild traumatic brain injury: a scoping review.Concussion. 2017 Aug 10;2(3):CNC38. doi: 10.2217/cnc-2016-0030. eCollection 2017 Nov. Concussion. 2017. PMID: 30202580 Free PMC article.
-
Specialist healthcare services for concussion/mild traumatic brain injury in England: a consensus statement using modified Delphi methodology.BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e077022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077022. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38070886 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources