Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes
- PMID: 24582021
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.019
Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes
Abstract
Introduction: This study was designed to assess the influence that the buccal corridor might have on the frontal facial attractiveness of subjects who had received orthodontic treatment with or without 4 premolar extractions.
Methods: Posttreatment full-face frontal smiling photographs of 30 premolar extraction and 27 nonextraction patients were evaluated by 20 orthodontists, 20 dentists, and 20 laypeople using a visual analog scale. The ratings were analyzed according to rater group, rater sex, and number of years in practice for orthodontists and dentists to search for any statistically significant differences in the ratings on the basis of treatment groups, subject sex, and buccal corridor widths and areas.
Results: Orthodontists and dentists gave higher mean overall frontal facial attractiveness scores than did laypeople. There were no significant differences in how men and women rated the study subjects. The number of years in practice did not affect how the orthodontists rated, but it did affect the ratings of the dentists. Female subjects were consistently rated as significantly more attractive than male subjects. There was no difference in ratings for the extraction and nonextraction subject groups. The buccal corridor widths and areas did not affect the frontal facial attractiveness ratings.
Conclusions: If treatment has been carried out with thorough diagnosis and careful planning, neither the choice of extraction or nonextraction treatment, nor the resulting buccal corridor widths or areas appeared to affect the subjects' frontal facial attractiveness.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Aug;146(2):135-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.012. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014. PMID: 25085288 No abstract available.
-
Author's response.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Aug;146(2):136. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014. PMID: 25085291 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.017. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24485736
-
Role of buccal corridor in smile esthetics and its correlation with underlying skeletal and dental structures.Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):187-94. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100424. Indian J Dent Res. 2012. PMID: 22945708
-
The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Mar;127(3):343-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15775949
-
Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness.Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):153-61. doi: 10.2319/040710-195.1. Angle Orthod. 2011. PMID: 20936969 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extraction vs nonextraction orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):83-106. doi: 10.2319/021123-98.1. Angle Orthod. 2024. PMID: 37899069 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Changes in the arch width and buccal corridor after fixed orthodontic treatment with Damon self-ligating system: premolar extraction vs. non-extraction.Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jul 8;29(3):e2423159. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e2423159.oar. eCollection 2024. Dental Press J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 38985075 Free PMC article.
-
Golden Mean and Proportion in Dental Esthetics after Orthodontic Treatments: An In Vivo Study.Dent J (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;10(12):235. doi: 10.3390/dj10120235. Dent J (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36547051 Free PMC article.
-
Smile Attractiveness: Differences among the Perceptions of Dental Professionals and Laypersons.Turk J Orthod. 2017 Jun;30(2):50-55. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17021. Epub 2017 Jun 1. Turk J Orthod. 2017. PMID: 30112492 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of facial pattern on the aesthetic assessment of the inclination of the occlusal plane in the frontal view.Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Mar 11;29(4):178. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06254-z. Clin Oral Investig. 2025. PMID: 40064713 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship between Posttreatment Smile Esthetics and the ABO Objective Grading System: Class I Extraction versus Non-Extraction Cases.Turk J Orthod. 2020 Dec 2;34(1):39-45. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20030. eCollection 2021. Turk J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 33828877 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources