Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of animal studies: omission of well-established methods
- PMID: 24583401
- PMCID: PMC3948042
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307727
Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of animal studies: omission of well-established methods
Erratum in
- Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Sep;122(9):A234
Conflict of interest statement
The authors had complete control over the design, conduct, interpretation, and reporting of the analyses included in this letter. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinions or policies of the authors’ employers or clients.
None of the authors received specific financial support or honorarium as compensation for developing this letter. Several authors are members of the Evidence-Based Toxicology Collaboration (EBTC), and M.L. Stephens and S. Hoffmann serve as the secretariats for the North American and European EBTC Steering Committees, respectively, for which they are compensated for their time. The EBTC’s overall aims are to improve toxicological decision making, facilitate the modernization of the toxicological toolbox, and reinvigorate the safety sciences (see
All authors contributed equally and are listed in alphabetical order.
Comment in
-
Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria: Krauth et al. Respond.Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Mar;122(3):A67. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307727R. Environ Health Perspect. 2014. PMID: 24583480 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Sep;121(9):985-92. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206389. Epub 2013 Jun 14. Environ Health Perspect. 2013. PMID: 23771496 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ågerstrand M, Breitholtz M, Rudén C. 2011Comparison of four different methods for reliability evaluation of ecotoxicity data: a case study of non-standard test data used in environmental risk assessments of pharmaceutical substances. Environ Sci Eur 2317; 10.1186/2190-4715-23-17 - DOI
-
- FDA (Food and Drug Administration). General Guidelines for Designing and Conducting Toxicity Studies. In: Guidance for Industry and Other Stakeholders, Toxicological Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Ingredients. Redbook. 2003;2000 Available: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryIn... [accessed 15 October 2013]
-
- Hulzebos E, Gunnarsdottir S, Rila JP, Dang Z, Rorije E. An Integrated Assessment Scheme for assessing the adequacy of (eco)toxicological data under REACH. Toxicol Lett. 2010;198(2):255–262. - PubMed
-
- NTP (National Toxicology Program). 2013a. Appendix 2: Risk of Bias Guidance for BPA Exposure and Obesity Protocol. Available: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/NTP/OHAT/EvaluationProcess/Appendix2BPA_Draft.pdf [accessed 13 February 2014].
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources