Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;5(4):307-16.
doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0029-0. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

The immunostimulatory effects of retinoblastoma cell supernatant on dendritic cells

Affiliations

The immunostimulatory effects of retinoblastoma cell supernatant on dendritic cells

Juan Ma et al. Protein Cell. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial for the induction and maintenance of tumor-specific immune responses. Studies have shown that tumor-associated DCs are immunosuppressed in some human tumors. However, phenotype and function of DCs in retinoblastoma (RB) remain unclear. RB cell supernatant (RBcs) was used to treat DCs in vitro to explore the effect of RB cells on DCs. DCs were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy donors. On day 5 of culture, DCs were treated with RBcs for 24 h, and then purified using magnetic beads. The maturation of DCs was induced by TNF-α or LPS. After treatment with RBcs, expression of co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 was elevated in DCs, accompanied by increased production of IL-12p70, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-8 but decreased production of IL-10. RBcs neither inhibited DC maturation nor promoted DC apoptosis. Moreover, RBcs-exposed DCs stimulated allogenetic T cell proliferation and T cell-derived cytokine production. These results indicate that RBcs can improve DCs' antigen presenting function and capability to activate T cells, suggesting that RB cells may have an immunostimulatory effect on DCs, and DC-based immunotherapy may be adopted in the treatment of RB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The photomicrograph of DC cultures (200×). Control DCs or RBcs-exposed DCs were treated with 20 ng/mL TNF-α (A) or 1 μg/mL LPS (B) for 24 h. Y79 DC: RBcs-exposed DCs
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression of DC markers, MHC and co-stimulatory molecules in RBcs-exposed DC. Control DCs or RBcs-exposed DCs were treated with 20 ng/mL TNF-α (A) or 1 μg/mL LPS (B) for 24 h. The cells were then harvested for immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry. Bold lines denote fluorescence when stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibody to the indicated antigen, and fine lines denote fluorescence when stained with isotype control mAb. Data shown are a representative experiment of five. Y79 DC: RBcs-exposed DCs
Figure 3
Figure 3
Production of cytokines IL-12, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 by RBcs-exposed DCs. Control DCs or RBcs-exposed DCs (4 × 104 cells/well) were treated with 20 ng/mL TNF-α (A) or 1 μg/mL LPS (B) for 24 h. Concentrations of cytokines in cell-free supernatants were analyzed by CBA Human Inflammation Kit that could identify all six kinds of cytokines in a single sample. Quantitative production of a particular kind of cytokine is indicated by PE-labeled-specific Ab staining. The data are mean values ± SD of triplicate determinations. Data shown are a representative experiment of three. *P < 0.05, vs. control DCs. **P < 0.01, vs. control DCs. Y79 DC: RBcs-exposed DCs
Figure 4
Figure 4
Apoptosis of RBcs-exposed DCs. Control DCs or RBcs-exposed DCs were treated with 20 ng/mL TNF-α (A) or 1 μg/mL LPS (B) for 24 h. DCs were stained with FITC-Annexin-V and propidium iodide (PI), and the proportion of apoptotic cells (Annexin+/PI-) was determined by flow cytometry (a and b). Apoptosis was also assessed by a FACS-based TUNEL assay utilizing FITC-dUTP. The proportion of apoptotic cells (dUTP+) was determined by flow cytometry (c and d). Data shown are one representative experiment of three. Y79 DC: RBcs-exposed DCs
Figure 5
Figure 5
Enhanced allogenetic T cell proliferation stimulated by RBcs-exposed DCs. After treatment with TNF-α (A) or LPS (B) for 24 h, varying numbers (400, 2000, or 10000) of irradiated (30 Gy) DCs were added to triplicate wells containing 2 × 105 purified allogeneic T lymphocytes and incubated for 4 days. Cultures were pulsed during the final 8 h of incubation, and incorporation of [3H]-thymidine was measured. The data are mean values ± SD of triplicate determinations. Data shown are a representative experiment of three. *P < 0.05, vs control DCs. **P < 0.01, vs control DCs. Y79 DC: RBcs-exposed DCs
Figure 6
Figure 6
Increased cytokine production of by allogenetic T cell stimulated with RBcs-exposed DCs. After treatment with TNF-α (A) or LPS (B) for 24 h, varying numbers (400, 2000, or 10000) of irradiated (30 Gy) DCs were added to triplicate wells containing 2 × 105 purified allogeneic T lymphocytes and incubated for 3 days. The concentrations of cytokines producted in cell-free supernatants were analyzed by CBA Human Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine Kit that could identify all seven kinds of cytokines in a single sample. Quantitative production of a particular kind of cytokine is indicated by PE-labeled-specific Ab staining. The data are mean values ± SD of triplicate determinations. Data shown are a representative experiment of three. *P < 0.05, vs. control DCs. **P < 0.01, vs. control DCs. ***P < 0.001, vs. control DCs. Y79 DC: RBcs-exposed DCs
Figure 6
Figure 6
Increased cytokine production of by allogenetic T cell stimulated with RBcs-exposed DCs. After treatment with TNF-α (A) or LPS (B) for 24 h, varying numbers (400, 2000, or 10000) of irradiated (30 Gy) DCs were added to triplicate wells containing 2 × 105 purified allogeneic T lymphocytes and incubated for 3 days. The concentrations of cytokines producted in cell-free supernatants were analyzed by CBA Human Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine Kit that could identify all seven kinds of cytokines in a single sample. Quantitative production of a particular kind of cytokine is indicated by PE-labeled-specific Ab staining. The data are mean values ± SD of triplicate determinations. Data shown are a representative experiment of three. *P < 0.05, vs. control DCs. **P < 0.01, vs. control DCs. ***P < 0.001, vs. control DCs. Y79 DC: RBcs-exposed DCs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ataera H, Hyde E, Price KM, Stoitzner P, Ronchese F. Murine melanoma-infiltrating dendritic cells are defective in antigen presenting function regardless of the presence of CD4CD25 regulatory T cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017515. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckebaum S, Zhang X, Chen X, Yu Z, Frilling A, Dworacki G, Grosse-Wilde H, Broelsch CE, Gerken G, Cicinnati VR. Increased levels of interleukin-10 in serum from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma correlate with profound numerical deficiencies and immature phenotype of circulating dendritic cell subsets. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7260–7269. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0872. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bharadwaj U, Li M, Zhang R, Chen C, Yao Q. Elevated interleukin-6 and G-CSF in human pancreatic cancer cell conditioned medium suppress dendritic cell differentiation and activation. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5479–5488. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3963. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carreno BM, Collins M. The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: new pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:29–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.091101.091806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaux P, Favre N, Martin M, Martin F. Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells are defective in their antigen-presenting function and inducible B7 expression in rats. Int J Cancer. 1997;72:619–624. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970807)72:4<619::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO;2-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms