Death receptor (DR4) haplotypes are associated with increased susceptibility of gallbladder carcinoma in north Indian population
- PMID: 24587306
- PMCID: PMC3938657
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090264
Death receptor (DR4) haplotypes are associated with increased susceptibility of gallbladder carcinoma in north Indian population
Abstract
Background and aim: Defective apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer development and progression. Death receptors (DR4, FAS) and their ligands (TRAIL, FASL) are thought to mediate the major extrinsic apoptotic pathway in the cell. SNPs in these genes may lead to defective apoptosis. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate the association of functional SNPs of DR4 (rs20575, rs20576 and rs6557634), FAS (rs2234767) and FASL (rs763110) with gallbladder cancer (GBC) risk.
Methods: This case-control study included 400 GBC and 246 healthy controls (HC). Genotyping was carried out by Taqman genotyping assays. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS ver16. Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis software (Version 2.0, BIOSTAT, Englewood, NJ) to systematically summarize the possible association of SNP with cancer risk. Functional prediction of these variants was carried out using Bioinformatics tools (FAST-SNP, F-SNP). False discovery rate (FDR test) was used in multiple comparisons.
Results: The DR4 C rs20575 A rs20576 A rs6557634, G rs20575 A rs20576 G rs6557634 and G rs20575 C rs20576 G rs6557634 haplotypes conferred two-fold increased risk for GBC. Among these, the DR4 C rs20575 A rs20576 A rs6557634 haplotype emerged as main factor influencing GBC susceptibility as the risk was not modulated by gender or gallstone stratification. Our meta-analysis results showed significant association of DR4 rs6557634 with overall cancer risk, GI cancers as well as in Caucasians. We didn't find any association of FAS and FASL SNPs with GBC susceptibility.
Conclusions: The DR4 haplotype C rs20575 A rs20576 A rs6557634 represents an important factor accounting the patients susceptibility to GBC probably due to decreased apoptosis. However, additional well-designed studies with larger sample size focusing on different ethnicities are required to further validate the results.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Hamdani NH, Qadri SK, Aggarwalla R, Bhartia VK, Chaudhuri S, et al. (2012) Clinicopathological study of gall bladder carcinoma with special reference to gallstones: our 8-year experience from eastern India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13: 5613–5617. - PubMed
-
- Murthy NS, Rajaram D, Gautam M (2011) Trends in incidence of gallbladder cancer–Indian scenario. Gastrointestinal cancer: Targets and therapy 1: 1–9.
-
- Jin K, Lan H, Zhu T, He K, Teng L (2011) Gallbladder carcinoma incidentally encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how to deal with it. Clin Transl Oncol 13: 25–33. - PubMed
-
- Kalita D, Pant L, Singh S, Jain G, Kudesia M, et al. (2013) Impact of routine histopathological examination of gall bladder specimens on early detection of malignancy - a study of 4,115 cholecystectomy specimens. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14: 3315–3318. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
