Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2014 May;4(5):538-45.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-1038. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

Efficacy of intermittent combined RAF and MEK inhibition in a patient with concurrent BRAF- and NRAS-mutant malignancies

Affiliations
Case Reports

Efficacy of intermittent combined RAF and MEK inhibition in a patient with concurrent BRAF- and NRAS-mutant malignancies

Omar Abdel-Wahab et al. Cancer Discov. 2014 May.

Abstract

Vemurafenib, a RAF inhibitor, extends survival in patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma but activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling in RAS-mutant cells. In a patient with a BRAF(V600K)-mutant melanoma responding to vemurafenib, we observed accelerated progression of a previously unrecognized NRAS-mutant leukemia. We hypothesized that combining vemurafenib with a MAP-ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitor would inhibit ERK activation in the melanoma and prevent ERK activation by vemurafenib in the leukemia, and thus suppress both malignancies. We demonstrate that intermittent administration of vemurafenib led to a near-complete remission of the melanoma, and the addition of the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib (GDC-0973) caused suppression of vemurafenib-induced leukemic proliferation and ERK activation. Antimelanoma and antileukemia responses have been maintained for nearly 20 months, as documented by serial measurements of tumor-derived DNA in plasma in addition to conventional radiographic and clinical assessments of response. These data support testing of intermittent ERK pathway inhibition in the therapy for both RAS-mutant leukemia and BRAF-mutant melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Margaret K. Callahan has received a commercial research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb and is a consultant/advisory board member of GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol-Myers Squibb. N. Rosen has received a commercial research grant from Chugai and is a consultant/advisory board member of Chugai and AstraZeneca. P.B. Chapman is a consultant/advisory board member of Genentech. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment and clinical course of a patient with BRAFV600K-mutant melanoma and NRASG12R-mutant CMML treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib. A, the peripheral WBC (blue lines) and monocyte counts (red lines) throughout the treatment. Gray bars, vemurafenib therapy; open green bars, cobimetinib therapy. The width of the bars indicates duration of treatment. The relative heights of the bars reflect dose level adjustments as indicated on the right Y-axes [960, 720, and 480 mg twice a day (bid) for vemurafenib; 60, 40, and 20 mg every day for cobimetinib]. Arrows indicate times of bone marrow examinations. The antimelanoma response based on radiographic tumor measurements using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria is shown in B. C, the quantification of circulating CMML-derived (red line) and melanoma-derived (black line) DNA in the plasma measured by digital PCR. Y-axes indicate the ratio of mutated DNA to wild-type DNA circulating in the plasma. No samples were available for analysis between weeks 30 and 69 (indicated by the dotted line).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Viability curves and immunoblots revealing viability and activation of mitogen–activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling intermediates in NRASWT and NRASG12D AML cell lines (indicated with *) treated with various concentrations of cobimetinib, PLX4720, or both. A, IC 50 values of BRAF WT/ NRASG12D and BRAFWT/NRASWT AML cell lines with exposure to cobimetinib or PLX4720. B, the cell viability of BRAFWT/NRASG12D AML cell lines with exposure to varying concentrations of cobimetinib, PLX4720, or both. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. In A and B, data were derived from 72 hours of exposure to cells followed by CellTiter-Glo Luminescence assessment. C, immunoblots of pERK1/2 and total ERK1/2 (top) in NRASG12D-mutant and NRASWT human leukemia cell lines exposed to vehicle, cobimetinib, PLX4720, or PLX4720 + cobimetinib. Quantification of pERK1/2 relative to total ERK1/2 is displayed at the bottom. Cells were treated with 500 nmol/L of each drug for 24 hours.

References

    1. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joseph E, Pratilas C, Poulikakos P, Tadi M, Wang W, Taylor B, et al. The RAF inhibitor PLX4032 inhibits ERK signaling and tumor cell proliferation in a V600E BRAF-selective manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14903–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poulikakos P, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat K, Rosen N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010;464:427–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, Nourry A, Niculescu-Duvas I, Dhomen N, et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell. 2010;140:209–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callahan MK, Rampal R, Harding JJ, Klimek VM, Chung YR, Merghoub T, et al. Progression of RAS-mutant leukemia during RAF inhibitor treatment. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2316–21. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms