Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;18(8):1199-206.
doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.00469.x. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

Objective validation of central sensitization in the rat UVB and heat rekindling model

Affiliations

Objective validation of central sensitization in the rat UVB and heat rekindling model

N S Weerasinghe et al. Eur J Pain. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The UVB and heat rekindling (UVB/HR) model shows potential as a translatable inflammatory pain model. However, the occurrence of central sensitization in this model, a fundamental mechanism underlying chronic pain, has been debated. Face, construct and predictive validity are key requisites of animal models; electromyogram (EMG) recordings were utilized to objectively demonstrate validity of the rat UVB/HR model.

Methods: The UVB/HR model was induced on the heel of the hind paw under anaesthesia. Mechanical withdrawal thresholds (MWTs) were obtained from biceps femoris EMG responses to a gradually increasing pinch at the mid hind paw region under alfaxalone anaesthesia, 96 h after UVB irradiation. MWT was compared between UVB/HR and SHAM-treated rats (anaesthetic only). Underlying central mechanisms in the model were pharmacologically validated by MWT measurement following intrathecal N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, MK-801, or saline.

Results: Secondary hyperalgesia was confirmed by a significantly lower pre-drug MWT {mean [±standard error of the mean (SEM)]} in UVB/HR [56.3 (±2.1) g/mm(2) , n = 15] compared with SHAM-treated rats [69.3 (±2.9) g/mm(2) , n = 8], confirming face validity of the model. Predictive validity was demonstrated by the attenuation of secondary hyperalgesia by MK-801, where mean (±SEM) MWT was significantly higher [77.2 (±5.9) g/mm(2) n = 7] in comparison with pre-drug [57.8 (±3.5) g/mm(2) n = 7] and saline [57.0 (±3.2) g/mm(2) n = 8] at peak drug effect. The occurrence of central sensitization confirmed construct validity of the UVB/HR model.

Conclusions: This study used objective outcome measures of secondary hyperalgesia to validate the rat UVB/HR model as a translational model of inflammatory pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Figures showing pre-drug mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) to a pinch of increasing magnitude applied to the mid-region (i.e., area of secondary hyperalgesia) of the ipsilateral hind paw in UVB and heat rekindled (UVB/HR) and SHAM-treated rats. An example of raw data from a pre-drug recording is demonstrated in (Ai) from a UVB/HR rat and (Aii) from a SHAM-treated rat. Scale bars correlate to both (Ai) and (Aii). (B) Scatter plot showing overall pre-drug MWT in UVB/HR (n = 15) and SHAM-treated rats (n = 8). Each point represents data from an individual animal 4 days after initial UVB treatment or SHAM treatment. Horizontal lines represent mean ± standard error of the mean. **p < 0.01, unpaired t-test.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Figures showing the effect of intrathecal administration of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, MK-801 or saline on mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) in response to a pinch of increasing magnitude in the mid-region (i.e., area of secondary hyperalgesia) of the ipsilateral hind paw. An example of raw data from a UVB/HR rat is demonstrated in (Ai) showing a pre-drug MWT response and (Aii) MWT 30 min after MK-801 administration in the same rat. Scale bars correlate to both (Ai) and (Aii). (B) Time course of drug action in all groups [UVB/HR + MK-801 = 7 (squares), UVB/HR + saline =8 (circles), SHAM + MK-801 = 8 (triangles)] where MK-801 or saline was administered immediately after obtaining pre-drug responses. Post-drug responses were recorded every 15 min for 60 min, where each data point represents mean ± standard error of the mean 4 days after initial UVB or SHAM treatment. **p < 0.01 within group, ##p < 0.01 between groups, two-way analysis of variance following by Bonferroni post hoc test.

References

    1. Ali Z, Meyer RA, Campbell JN. Secondary hyperalgesia to mechanical but not heat stimuli following a capsaicin injection in hairy skin. Pain. 1996;68:401–411. - PubMed
    1. Andresen T, Staahl C, Oksche A, Mansikka H, Arendt-Nielsen L, Drewes AM. Effect of transdermal opioids in experimentally induced superficial, deep and hyperalgesic pain. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:934–945. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballantyne JC, Cousins MJ, Giamberardino MA, McGrath P, Rajagopa MR, Smith M, Sommer C, Wittink HM. 2010. Do Animal Models Tell Us about Human Pain? International Association for the Study of Pain. PAIN clinical updates.
    1. Benrath J, Gillardon F, Zimmermann M. Differential time courses of skin blood flow and hyperalgesia in the human sunburn reaction following ultraviolet irradiation of the skin. Eur J Pain. 2001;5:155–167. - PubMed
    1. Bishop T, Ballard A, Holmes H, Young AR, McMahon SB. Ultraviolet-B induced inflammation of human skin: Characterisation and comparison with traditional models of hyperlagesia. Eur J Pain. 2009;13:524–532. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources