Factors influencing the contraceptive method choice: a university hospital experience
- PMID: 24592017
- PMCID: PMC3939130
- DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2012.07
Factors influencing the contraceptive method choice: a university hospital experience
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the factors influencing behavior of women in choosing contraceptive methods.
Material and methods: A total of 4022 women who were admitted to our clinic in a year, were the subjects in this current study for contraception choices. Relationship between the current contraceptive choice and the age, marital status, educational level, gravidity and induced abortions were evaluated.
Results: Current users of any contraceptive methods were found to make up thirty-three percent of the entire study population. The most preferred method of contraception was an intrauterine device (46.4%), followed by, condom (19.2%), coitus interruptus (16.4%), tubal sterilization (11%), oral contraceptives (5.7%) and lastly the "other methods" that consisted of depot injectables and implants (1.2%). Among other contraceptive methods, the condom was found to be used mostly by the younger age group (OR:0.956, 95% CI:0.936-0.976, p<0.001), while tubal sterilization was preferred mainly by the elderly population (p<0.001, OR:1.091, 95% CI:1.062-1.122). Women that have a higher educational level, were found to use OC (76.3%, OR:5.970, 95% CI:3.233-11.022), tubal sterilization (59.6%, OR:4.110, 95% CI:2.694-6.271) and other methods (62.5%, OR:3.279, 95% CI:1.033-10.402) more commonly than the low educational group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: These results demonstrated that the rates of both contraception utilization and the usage of more effective methods of contraception need to be increased by providing better family planning systems and counselling opportunities.
Amaç: Kontraseptif yöntem seçimini etkileyen faktörlerin analizi.
Gereç ve yöntemler: Bir yıllık süre içerisinde kliniğimize başvuran 4022 olgunun, kontraseptif yöntem seçimleri incelendi. Mevcut kontraseptif seçimleri ve yaş, medeni hal, eğitim seviyesi, gebelik, kürtaj durumları arasındaki ilişki değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Kontraseptif yöntem kullanan olgular, çalışma popülasyonunun %33’ünü oluşturmaktadır. En çok tercih edilen yöntem rahim içi araç (%46.4) iken, diğer yöntemler sırasıyla; kondom %19.2, geri çekme %16.4, tubal sterilizasyon %11, oral kontraseptifler %5.7, depo enjeksiyonlar ve implantlar %1.2 oranında kullanılmaktadırlar. Kondom diğer metotlara göre daha genç yaş grubunda tercih edilmekte iken (OR:0.956, %95 CI:0.936–0.976, p<0.001), tubal sterilizasyonun daha ileri yaş olgular tarafından tercih edildiği saptandı (p<0.001, OR:1.091, %95 CI:1.062–1.122). Eğitim seviyeleri, oral kontraseptif (%76.3, OR:5.970, %95 CI:3.233–11.022), tubal sterilizasyon (%59.6, OR:4.110, %95 CI:2.694–6.271), depo enjeksiyon ve implant (%62.5, OR:3.279, %95 CI:1.033–10.402) kullanıcılarında diğer gruplara göre anlamlı oranda yüksek saptandı (p<0.001).
Sonuçlar: Bu sonuçlar daha iyi bir aile planlaması sistemi ve danışmanlığı ile hem kontrasepsiyon oranının artırılması hem de daha etkin yöntemlerin kullanımının yaygınlaştırılması gerektiğini göstermektedir.
Keywords: Contraceptives; demographic factors; intrauterine device; method choice.
Similar articles
-
Trends in contraception and sterilization in Australia.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Aug;31(3):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1991.tb02781.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991. PMID: 1804078
-
Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Jan;73(1):48-52. doi: 10.3109/00016349409013393. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994. PMID: 8304025
-
Women's satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women.Contraception. 1999 May;59(5):277-86. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00034-7. Contraception. 1999. PMID: 10494480
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Adolescent contraception: nonhormonal methods.Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;36(3):717-30. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36693-7. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989. PMID: 2660093 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of body weight among hormonal and non-hormonal users in a Malaysian cohort.J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2018 Dec 21;14(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.11.012. eCollection 2019 Feb. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 31435386 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with contraceptive use among women living with HIV in Canada: a controlled, cross-sectional study.Reprod Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01312-7. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 34986848 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods utilization among married women of reproductive age groups in western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Aug 6;21:246. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.246.5835. eCollection 2015. Pan Afr Med J. 2015. PMID: 26523185 Free PMC article.
-
Women's empowerment and fertility preferences of married women: analysis of demographic and health survey'2016 in Timor-Leste.AIMS Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;9(2):237-261. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022017. eCollection 2022. AIMS Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35634022 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Salter C, Johnston HB, Hengen N. Population Report, Series L, No. 10. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program; 1997. Care for postabortion complication; Saving women’s life.
-
- Paxman J, Rizo A, Brown L, Benson J. The clandestine epidemic: the practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America. Stud Fam Plan. 1993;24:206–14. - PubMed
-
- Sathar ZA, Chidambaram VC. Differentials in contraceptive use. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute; 1984.
-
- Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital Health Stat. 2010;2329:1–44. - PubMed
-
- Turan JM, Bulut A, Nalbant H. The quality of family planning services in two low-income district of Istanbul. Turk J Popul Stud. 1997;19:3–24. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources