Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 1;13(2):102-5.
doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2012.07. eCollection 2012.

Factors influencing the contraceptive method choice: a university hospital experience

Affiliations

Factors influencing the contraceptive method choice: a university hospital experience

Korhan Kahraman et al. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the factors influencing behavior of women in choosing contraceptive methods.

Material and methods: A total of 4022 women who were admitted to our clinic in a year, were the subjects in this current study for contraception choices. Relationship between the current contraceptive choice and the age, marital status, educational level, gravidity and induced abortions were evaluated.

Results: Current users of any contraceptive methods were found to make up thirty-three percent of the entire study population. The most preferred method of contraception was an intrauterine device (46.4%), followed by, condom (19.2%), coitus interruptus (16.4%), tubal sterilization (11%), oral contraceptives (5.7%) and lastly the "other methods" that consisted of depot injectables and implants (1.2%). Among other contraceptive methods, the condom was found to be used mostly by the younger age group (OR:0.956, 95% CI:0.936-0.976, p<0.001), while tubal sterilization was preferred mainly by the elderly population (p<0.001, OR:1.091, 95% CI:1.062-1.122). Women that have a higher educational level, were found to use OC (76.3%, OR:5.970, 95% CI:3.233-11.022), tubal sterilization (59.6%, OR:4.110, 95% CI:2.694-6.271) and other methods (62.5%, OR:3.279, 95% CI:1.033-10.402) more commonly than the low educational group (p<0.001).

Conclusion: These results demonstrated that the rates of both contraception utilization and the usage of more effective methods of contraception need to be increased by providing better family planning systems and counselling opportunities.

Amaç: Kontraseptif yöntem seçimini etkileyen faktörlerin analizi.

Gereç ve yöntemler: Bir yıllık süre içerisinde kliniğimize başvuran 4022 olgunun, kontraseptif yöntem seçimleri incelendi. Mevcut kontraseptif seçimleri ve yaş, medeni hal, eğitim seviyesi, gebelik, kürtaj durumları arasındaki ilişki değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Kontraseptif yöntem kullanan olgular, çalışma popülasyonunun %33’ünü oluşturmaktadır. En çok tercih edilen yöntem rahim içi araç (%46.4) iken, diğer yöntemler sırasıyla; kondom %19.2, geri çekme %16.4, tubal sterilizasyon %11, oral kontraseptifler %5.7, depo enjeksiyonlar ve implantlar %1.2 oranında kullanılmaktadırlar. Kondom diğer metotlara göre daha genç yaş grubunda tercih edilmekte iken (OR:0.956, %95 CI:0.936–0.976, p<0.001), tubal sterilizasyonun daha ileri yaş olgular tarafından tercih edildiği saptandı (p<0.001, OR:1.091, %95 CI:1.062–1.122). Eğitim seviyeleri, oral kontraseptif (%76.3, OR:5.970, %95 CI:3.233–11.022), tubal sterilizasyon (%59.6, OR:4.110, %95 CI:2.694–6.271), depo enjeksiyon ve implant (%62.5, OR:3.279, %95 CI:1.033–10.402) kullanıcılarında diğer gruplara göre anlamlı oranda yüksek saptandı (p<0.001).

Sonuçlar: Bu sonuçlar daha iyi bir aile planlaması sistemi ve danışmanlığı ile hem kontrasepsiyon oranının artırılması hem de daha etkin yöntemlerin kullanımının yaygınlaştırılması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords: Contraceptives; demographic factors; intrauterine device; method choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salter C, Johnston HB, Hengen N. Population Report, Series L, No. 10. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program; 1997. Care for postabortion complication; Saving women’s life.
    1. Paxman J, Rizo A, Brown L, Benson J. The clandestine epidemic: the practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America. Stud Fam Plan. 1993;24:206–14. - PubMed
    1. Sathar ZA, Chidambaram VC. Differentials in contraceptive use. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute; 1984.
    1. Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital Health Stat. 2010;2329:1–44. - PubMed
    1. Turan JM, Bulut A, Nalbant H. The quality of family planning services in two low-income district of Istanbul. Turk J Popul Stud. 1997;19:3–24. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources