The implications of diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses using European and South Asian growth charts: an outcome-based comparative study
- PMID: 24592169
- PMCID: PMC3925569
- DOI: 10.1155/2014/474809
The implications of diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses using European and South Asian growth charts: an outcome-based comparative study
Abstract
The antenatal condition of small for gestational age (SGA) is significantly associated with perinatal morbidity and mortality and it is known that there are significant differences in birth weight and fetal size among different populations. The aim of our study was to assess the impact on outcomes of the diagnosis of SGA according to Bangladeshi and European antenatal growth charts in Sri Lankan population. The estimated fetal weight before delivery was retrospectively reviewed according to Bangladeshi and European growth references. Three groups were identified: Group 1-SGA according to Bangladeshi growth chart; Group 2-SGA according to European growth chart but not having SGA according to Bangladeshi growth chart; Group 3-No SGA according to both charts. There was a difference in prevalence of SGA between Bangladeshi and European growth charts: 12.7% and 51.7%, respectively. There were statistically significant higher rates in emergency cesarean section, fetal distress in labour, and intrauterine death (P < 0.001) in Group 1 compared with Group, 2 and 3. No differences of outcomes occurred between Groups 2 and 3. Our study demonstrated that only cases diagnosed as SGA according to population-based growth charts are at risk of adverse outcome. The use of inappropriate prenatal growth charts might lead to misdiagnosis and potential unnecessary interventions.
Similar articles
-
Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 4;16(10):e1002923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002923. eCollection 2019 Oct. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 31584941 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal outcomes and placental histology in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies-A comparison of population-based and universal growth charts.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;159(3):825-832. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14262. Epub 2022 Jun 1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 35574629
-
Adverse neonatal outcome in twin pregnancy complicated by small-for-gestational age: twin vs singleton reference charts.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;59(3):377-384. doi: 10.1002/uog.23764. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34405924
-
[Prevalence, risk factors, maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality of intrauterine growth restriction and small-for-gestational age].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Dec;42(8):895-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Nov 9. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013. PMID: 24216305 Review. French.
-
Should twin-specific growth charts be used to assess fetal growth in twin pregnancies?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):10-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.027. Epub 2022 Jan 31. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35114185 Review.
Cited by
-
Fetal growth trajectories in pregnancies of European and South Asian mothers with and without gestational diabetes, a population-based cohort study.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 2;12(3):e0172946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172946. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28253366 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Kirby RS, Carlo WA. Fetal growth risk curves: defining levels of fetal growth restriction by neonatal death risk. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;195(6):1571–1577. - PubMed
-
- Mayer C, Joseph KS. Fetal growth: a review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013;41:136–145. - PubMed
-
- McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340(16):1234–1238. - PubMed
-
- Ounsted M, Moar V, Scott WA. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in small-for-dates babies: the relative importance of some maternal factors. Early Human Development. 1981;5(4):367–375. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources