Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):81-90.
doi: 10.7326/M12-1977.

Insurance status and the transfer of hospitalized patients: an observational study

Observational Study

Insurance status and the transfer of hospitalized patients: an observational study

Janel Hanmer et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: There is little objective evidence to support concerns that patients are transferred between hospitals based on insurance status.

Objective: To examine the relationship between patients' insurance coverage and interhospital transfer.

Design: Data analyzed from the 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Patients: All patients aged 18 to 64 years discharged alive from U.S. acute care hospitals with 1 of 5 common diagnoses (biliary tract disease, chest pain, pneumonia, septicemia, and skin or subcutaneous infection).

Measurements: For each diagnosis, the proportion of hospitalized patients who were transferred to another acute care hospital based on insurance coverage (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured) was compared. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of transfer for uninsured patients (reference category, privately insured) while patient- and hospital-level factors were adjusted for. All analyses incorporated sampling and poststratification weights.

Results: Among 315 748 patients discharged from 1051 hospitals with any of the 5 diagnoses, the percentage of patients transferred to another acute care hospital varied from 1.3% (skin infection) to 5.1% (septicemia). In unadjusted analyses, uninsured patients were significantly less likely to be transferred for 3 diagnoses (P 0.05). In adjusted analyses, uninsured patients were significantly less likely to be transferred than privately insured patients for 4 diagnoses: biliary tract disease (odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.96]), chest pain (odds ratio, 0.63 [CI, 0.44 to 0.89]), septicemia (odds ratio, 0.76 [CI, 0.64 to 0.91]), and skin infections (odds ratio, 0.64 [CI, 0.46 to 0.89]). Women were significantly less likely to be transferred than men for all diagnoses.

Limitation: This analysis relied on administrative data and lacked clinical detail.

Conclusion: Uninsured patients (and women) were significantly less likely to undergo interhospital transfer. Differences in transfer rates may contribute to health care disparities.

Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, Pub L No. 99-272. 1986.
    1. Lee TM. An EMTALA primer: the impact of changes in the emergency medicine landscape on EMTALA compliance and enforcement. Ann Health Law. 2004;13(1):145–178. - PubMed
    1. Kamoie BE. EMTALA: reaching beyond the emergency room to expand hospital liability. J Health Law. 2000;33(1):25–55. - PubMed
    1. McCarthy JJ. In: “EMTALA Review” in Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery. Moore LJ, Turner KL, Todd SR, editors. Springer; New York: 2013.
    1. Swank SE. [Accessed April 2013];Why EMTALA is Worth Another Look - The Inpatient Debate: New Regulations Coming Soon? Health Law Alert Newsletter. 2012 (11) http://www.ober.com/publications/1867-why-emtala-worth-another-look---in....

Publication types