Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;10(3):e137-41.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001295. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

Using a question prompt list as a communication aid in advanced cancer care

Affiliations

Using a question prompt list as a communication aid in advanced cancer care

Jonathan C Yeh et al. J Oncol Pract. 2014 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Oncologists and patients often avoid discussing prognosis, treatment failure, and end-of-life planning. Thus, many patients still overestimate their prognosis and possibility of cure, impairing decision making. We piloted a question prompt list (QPL) covering these issues to determine whether it would affect patient anxiety and how it would be used and received by new oncology patients.

Materials and methods: A one-page checklist of common questions surrounding cancer care, quality of life, and end of life was created from previous instruments. A total of 30 patients with advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer were recruited from outpatient clinics. Patients received the QPL before their initial consultation. Patient anxiety, satisfaction, and information/decision-making preferences were assessed using validated instruments. Patient opinions regarding the QPL were solicited through Likert-scale items.

Results: During their visit, 27 patients (90%) used the QPL, but notably, none shared it directly with their oncologist. Most participants felt that the QPL was relevant and helpful (90%) and recommended that more physicians use this sort of list (90%) while disagreeing that the QPL made them feel anxious (80%). Generally, participants were highly satisfied with the consultation, and their anxiety decreased during the visit (P < .005).

Conclusion: A simple, one-page QPL addressing cancer treatment, prognosis, quality of life, and end-of-life issues was well received by new oncology patients and did not affect patient anxiety or physician workflow. Follow-up studies will determine whether use of the QPL increases knowledge, facilitates decision making, and improves advance-care planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Matsuyama R, Reddy S, Smith TJ: Why do patients choose chemotherapy near the end of life? A review of the perspective of those facing death from cancer J Clin Oncol 24:3490–3496,2006 - PubMed
    1. Harrington SE, Smith TJ: The role of chemotherapy at the end of life: “When is enough, enough?” JAMA 299:2667–2678,2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mack JW Cronin A Taback N, etal: End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: A cohort study Ann Intern Med 156:204–210,2002 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith TJ Dow LA Virago EA, etal: A pilot trial of decision aids to give truthful prognostic and treatment information to chemotherapy patients with advanced cancer J Support Oncol 9:79–86,2011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith TJ, Longo DL: Talking with patients about dying N Engl J Med 367:1651–1652,2012 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources