Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90412.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090412. eCollection 2014.

The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography versus endoscopy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Yong Gao  1 , Jun-Jie Liu  1 , Shang-Yong Zhu  1 , Xiang Yi  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography versus endoscopy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Yong Gao et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) with the current clinical standard of endoscopy for a diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods: A total of 150 patients suspected of having NPC underwent US and endoscopy. A diagnosis was obtained from an endoscopic biopsy collected from each suspected tumor and was compared with a biopsy obtained from a normal nasopharynx. The diagnostic accuracy of US and endoscopy for NPC was evaluated using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis performed by MedCalc Software.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US versus endoscopy for this cohort were 90.1%, 84.8%, and 87.3% for US, and 88.7%, 97.5%, and 93.3% for endoscopy, respectively. Both US and endoscopy exhibited good diagnostic accuracy for NPC with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.929 and 0.938, respectively. However, this difference was not significant (Z = 0.36, P = 0.72).

Conclusion: US is a useful tool for the detection of tumors in endoscopically suspicious nasopharynx tissues, and also for the detection of subclinical tumors in endoscopically normal nasopharynx tissues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagnostic accuracy of US and endoscopy using ROC analysis for this cohort (n = 150).
Figure 2
Figure 2. A 60-year-old male with NPC underwent US and endoscopy.
A large focal mass was detected on the right side of the nasopharynx by both US and endoscopy. A: An US image obtained by applying a 3.5–5.0 MHz convex-array transducer to the oblique plane. The large focal mass present in the nasopharynx is indicated with an arrow (grade 3). B: An US image of the transverse plane also showed a mass present (indicated with arrow). C: An US image scanned from the left detected normal nasopharynx tissue. The parotid gland (PG) provided an acoustic window with air from the upper pharyngeal recess (indicated with arrowhead) descending to the nasopharynx (indicated with curved arrow). D: An endoscopy image of a focal mass (indicated with arrow) present in the nasopharynx.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A 35-year-old female with NPC that was confined to the mucosa of the left pharyngeal recess underwent US and endoscopy.
A: An oblique US image obtained using a 3.5–5.0 MHz convex-array transducer showed that the tumor caused a focal mass (indicated with arrow) in the pharyngeal recess (US grade 3). B: An endoscopy image also showed a focal mass (indicated with arrow) present in the pharyngeal recess.
Figure 4
Figure 4. A 45-year-old female with NPC underwent US and endoscopy.
A: An oblique US image obtained using a 3.5–5.0 MHz convex-array transducer is shown. The tumor had infiltrated (indicated with arrow) the nasopharynx (US grade 3). B: An endoscopy image showed the pharyngeal recess to be slightly rough (indicated with arrow). C: A non-keratinizing undifferentiated carcinoma confirmed by pathology.
Figure 5
Figure 5. An US image obtained using a 3.5–5.0 MHz convex-array transducer applied to the oblique plane of a 75-year-old female with NPC that was not detected by endoscopy.
A NPC (grade 4) with a submucosal component (indicated with arrow) that had deeply invaded the parapharyngeal space (indicated with curved arrow) was detected.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chan AT, Felip E (2009) ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2009) Nasopharyngeal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 20: 123–125. - PubMed
    1. King AD, Vlantis AC, Bhatia KS, Zee BC, Woo JK, et al. (2011) Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy. Radiology 258: 531–537. - PubMed
    1. Wei WI, Sham JS, Zong YS, Choy D, Ng MH (1991) The efficacy of fiberoptic endoscopic examination and biopsy in the detection of early nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 67: 3127–3130. - PubMed
    1. King AD, Vlantis AC, Tsang RK, Gary TM, Au AK, et al. (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27: 1288–1291. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek A, King A (2012) MRI and CT of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198: 11–18. - PubMed

Publication types