Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e87172.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087172. eCollection 2014.

Unplanned reoperation within 30 days of fusion surgery for spinal deformity

Affiliations

Unplanned reoperation within 30 days of fusion surgery for spinal deformity

Zheng Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

No recent studies have analyzed the rates of or reasons for unanticipated revision surgery within 30 days of primary surgery in spinal deformity patients. Our aim was to examine the incidence, characteristics, reasons, and risk factors for unplanned revision surgery in spinal deformity patients treated at one institution. All patients with a diagnosis of spinal deformity presenting for primary instrumented spinal fusion at a single institution from 1998 to 2012 were reviewed. All unplanned reoperations performed within 30 days after primary surgery were analyzed in terms of demographics, surgical data, and complications. Statistical analyses were performed to obtain correlations and risk factors for anticipated revision. Of 2758 patients [aged 16.07 years (range, 2-71), 69.8% female] who underwent spinal fusion surgery, 59 (2.1%) required reoperation within 30 days after primary surgery. The length of follow up for each patient was more than 30 days. Of those that required reoperation, 87.0% had posterior surgery only, 5.7% had anterior surgery, and 7.3% underwent an anteroposterior approach. The reasons for reoperation included implant failure (n = 20), wound infection (n = 12), neurologic deficit (n = 9), pulmonary complications (n = 17), and coronal plane imbalance (n = 1). The risk factors for reoperation were age, diagnosis, and surgical procedure with osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Patient is a 15 year-old female with Marfan syndrome with scoliosis.
A and B, Standing preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. C and D, Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs 4 days after operation. E, Magnetic resonance images, showing improper implant location. F and G, Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs 4 days after reoperation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Patient is a 20 year-old male with congenital scoliosis.
A and B, Standing preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. C and D, Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs 4 days after operation. E, Magnetic resonance images showing improper implant location. F and G, Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs 5 days after reoperation.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Patient is a 16 year-old female with neuromuscular scoliosis.
A and B, Standing preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. C and D, Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs 4 days after operation showing pedicle screw loosening. E and F, Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs 5 days after reoperation.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Diagnosis and Reoperation Rates.
The statistically significant differences compared with the control are noted as *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001. Others include syndrome-related scoliosis, ankylosing spondylitis, achondroplasia with scoliosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wiggns GC, Rauzzino MJ, Bartkowski HM, Nockels RP, Shaffrey CI (2001) Management of complex pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity. J Neurosurg 95: 17–24. - PubMed
    1. Lykissas MG, Jain VV, Nathan ST, Pawar V, Eismann EA, et al. (2013) Mid- to long-term outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38: E113–119. - PubMed
    1. Csernatony Z, Kiss L, Mano S, Hunya Z (2013) Our experience and early results with a complementary implant for the correction of major thoracic curves. Eur Spine J - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liang CZ, Li FC, Li H, Tao Y, Zhou X, et al. (2012) Surgery is an effective and reasonable treatment for degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review. J Int Med Res 40: 399–405. - PubMed
    1. Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P, Chopin D (2012) Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37: 693–700. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources