Reducing febrile neutropenia rates in early breast cancer. Experience of two UK cancer centres
- PMID: 24595405
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2141-3
Reducing febrile neutropenia rates in early breast cancer. Experience of two UK cancer centres
Abstract
Purpose: Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used in many institutions across the UK due to unacceptable febrile neutropenia (FN) rates with FEC-D (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide-docetaxel). The resultant reduction in FN rate is thought to maintain dose intensity and improve patient experience. This retrospective study was performed to assess whether the addition of G-CSF primary prophylaxis into daily clinical practice has achieved these aims.
Methods: Collaborative audit performed in two UK cancer centres before and after the integration of G-CSF primary prophylaxis with FEC-D. The primary objective was FN rate.
Results: Data from 342 patients were analysed, 151 before routine use of primary G-CSF and 191 after. The FN rates were 30 and 11%, respectively. Despite the 99% adherence to primary G-CSF policy, there were more dose reductions (8 increased to 13%) and dose delays (11 increased to 23%) following the use of G-CSF primary prophylaxis. This appeared to be due to non-FN toxicities. Inpatient days decreased substantially from 93 to 16 and antibiotic courses from 28 to 13 (per hundred patients).
Conclusions: Near universal adherence to the G-CSF policy in FEC-D treatment has led to a reduction in FN rate and inpatient days but has not translated into improved dose intensity. This collaborative audit allows sufficient data to give insight into current practice and generate hypotheses for further investigation.
Similar articles
-
Incidence of febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D treatment.Support Care Cancer. 2014 Dec;22(12):3227-34. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2318-9. Epub 2014 Jul 5. Support Care Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24996828
-
Febrile neutropenia in FEC-D regimen for early stage breast cancer: is there a place for G-CSF primary prophylaxis?Breast Dis. 2015;35(3):167-71. doi: 10.3233/BD-150411. Breast Dis. 2015. PMID: 26406541
-
Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):387-394. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2805-7. Epub 2015 Jun 17. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26081595
-
Primary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant TC or FEC-D chemotherapy outside of clinical trial settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2012 Oct;20(10):2523-30. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1375-6. Epub 2012 Jan 15. Support Care Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22252548
-
The risk of febrile neutropenia and need for G-CSF primary prophylaxis with the docetaxel and cyclophosphamide regimen in early-stage breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Oct;153(3):591-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3531-z. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015. PMID: 26337685 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression and Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:736197. doi: 10.1155/2015/736197. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015. PMID: 26347793 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous