Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;231(16):3229-38.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3504-7. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

Effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement on reward responsiveness and opioid cue-reactivity

Affiliations

Effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement on reward responsiveness and opioid cue-reactivity

Eric L Garland et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Rationale: Dysregulated reward processing is a hallmark feature of drug addiction; however, scant research has evaluated restructuring reward processing in the context of addiction treatment.

Objectives: We examined effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) on reward responsiveness (RR) and opioid cue-reactivity in a sample of chronic pain patients with opioid use problems. We previously reported that MORE decreased pain, opioid misuse, and craving relative to a social support control group (SG). Here, we examined whether these outcomes were linked to changes in RR in a subset of participants.

Methods: Participants were chronic pain patients (71 % women, age 46.6 ± 13.9) who received MORE (n = 20) or SG (n = 29). RR was measured before and after 8 weeks of treatment via heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) responses during a dot probe task that included opioid-related, pain-related, and natural reward stimuli, as well as craving ratings.

Results: The MORE group, who reported decreased opioid misuse and opioid craving during treatment, evidenced less subjective opioid cue-reactivity, greater HR decelerations, and greater increases in HRV to all cues after treatment compared to the SG; HR and HRV effects were most pronounced for natural reward cues. Within the MORE group, HR deceleration to natural reward cues was correlated with increased subjective arousal to the cues, whereas HR deceleration to opioid cues was correlated with decreased subjective arousal. Effects of MORE on craving were mediated by enhanced RR.

Conclusions: Results suggest that during treatment with MORE, cardiac-autonomic responsiveness to non-drug reward increases, while reactivity to opioid reward decreases. Studies are needed to discern whether changes in RR were a result or a determinant of reductions in opioid misuse and craving. RR may play a role in addiction treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) and Support Group (SG) interventions on changes in heart rate (HR) from pre- to post-treatment during a 5-minute resting baseline and during three blocks of cues on a dot probe task. The HR change score value on the Y-axis was calculated by subtracting pre-treatment HR during each of the four conditions of the task (resting baseline, opioid cue, pain cue, and pleasure cue) from post-treatment HR during each of the four conditions of the task, such that a negative value indicates a decrease in HR at post-treatment from pre-treatment levels. Relative to the SG, the MORE group evidenced significantly greater pre-post treatment decreases in HR to all three cue types; however, there was no significant pre-post treatment change in HR during the resting baseline. Group X time X condition effect, F(1,46) = 5.20, p = .005, η2partial = .10. BPM = beats per minute.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Multivariate path model (N = 49) depicting statistical mediation of the craving-reducing effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement by heart rate responsiveness to pleasure cues. This model controls for pre-randomization group differences in opioid use disorder status (not depicted for visual parsimony). *p < 0.05

References

    1. Alcaro A, Panksepp J. The SEEKING mind: Primal neuro-affective substrates for appetitive incentive states and their pathological dynamics in addictions and depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35:1805–1820. - PubMed
    1. Augustus Diggs H, Froeliger B, Carlson JM, Gilbert DG. Smoker–nonsmoker differences in neural response to smoking-related and affective cues: An fMRI investigation. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging. 2013;211:85–87. - PubMed
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Berntson GG, Bigger JT, Jr, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufman PG, Malik M, Nagaraja HN, Porges SW, Saul JP, Stone PH, van der Molen MW. Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:623–648. - PubMed
    1. Bowen S, Chawla N, Collins SE, Witkiewitz K, Hsu S, Grow J, Marlatt A. Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: A pilot efficacy trial. Subst Abuse. 2009;30:295–305. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types