Implications of bevacizumab discontinuation in adults with recurrent glioblastoma
- PMID: 24596117
- PMCID: PMC4022226
- DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou021
Implications of bevacizumab discontinuation in adults with recurrent glioblastoma
Abstract
Background: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma benefiting from bevacizumab are often treated indefinitely due to concerns regarding rebound tumor recurrence upon discontinuation. However, treatment is discontinued for reasons other than disease progression in a subset of these patients, the characteristics and outcomes of which are poorly defined.
Methods: Of 342 adults with recurrent glioblastoma in our database treated with bevacizumab, 82 received treatment for ≥ 6 months; of these, bevacizumab was discontinued for reasons other than tumor progression in 18 patients (Bev-D) and for disease progression in the remainder (Bev-S). The impact of discontinuation on outcome was assessed with discontinuation as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox hazards model for progression-free survival.
Results: There was no difference in hazard rates for progression between Bev-D and Bev-S groups; the adjusted hazard ratio for progression using discontinuation as a time-dependent covariate was 0.91 (95% CI:0.47, 1.78). The median PFS after bevacizumab-discontinuation was 27 weeks (95% CI:15-NR). At progression, a higher proportion of Bev-D patients had local progression compared with the Bev-S patients. Salvage therapy in Bev-D patients yielded a PFS-26 weeks of 47% (95% CI:23%-94%) with a median PFS of 23 weeks (95% CI:12-NR), vs. 5% (95% CI: 1%-21%) and 9 weeks (95% CI: 6-11) in Bev-S patients (HR:0.3;CI, 0.1-0.6) (P = .0007).
Conclusions: Bevacizumab discontinuation unrelated to disease progression does not appear to cause rebound recurrence or worsen PFS in patients who benefit from bevacizumab. Additionally, Bev-D patients had an improved response to salvage therapy, findings which provide a strong basis for a prospective study.
Keywords: bevacizumab; discontinuation; glioblastoma; outcome; recurrence.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
References
-
- Stupp RMW, van den Brent MJ, Weller M, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352:987–996. - PubMed
-
- Wick WHC, Engel C, Stoffels M, et al. NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine or temozolomide. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:5874–5880. - PubMed
-
- Gilbert M. Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Fresh Look at Current Therapies and Emerging Novel Approaches. Seminars in Oncology. 2011;38:S21–S33. - PubMed
-
- Wick APC, Wick W, Jauch T, et al. Rechallenge with temozolomide in patients with recurrent gliomas. Journal of Neurology. 2009;256:734–741. - PubMed
-
- Friedman HSPM, Wen PY, Mikkelsen T, et al. Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:4733–4740. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
