Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount
- PMID: 24604276
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2345-6
Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount
Abstract
Anterior compartment repair is one of the most challenging issues in reconstructive pelvic surgery. Previous studies using strict anatomic criteria suggested a high failure rate after anterior colporrhaphy, prompting increased use of augmented repairs in the past decade. More recent studies suggest anterior colporrhaphy may provide symptom relief similar to that seen with augmented repairs without the risks associated with placement of mesh. There is a wide range of success rates for anterior colporrhaphy in the literature. The wide variation implies surgeon performance is a key issue in the success or failure of anterior compartment repair. It is critical to begin measuring and reporting surgeon performance in research trials and monitoring surgeon performance in clinical practice in order to make meaningful comparisons of surgical techniques and improve patient care.
Similar articles
-
Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse.N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1826-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009521. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21561348 Clinical Trial.
-
Reanalysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy using clinically relevant definitions of success.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):69.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Mar 22. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21545996 Clinical Trial.
-
A 3-year follow-up after anterior colporrhaphy compared with collagen-coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):136-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13628. Epub 2015 Sep 30. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 26420345 Clinical Trial.
-
Anterior colporrhaphy: a standard operation? Systematic review of the technical aspects of a common procedure in randomized controlled trials.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):781-788. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3510-5. Epub 2017 Dec 6. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 29214325 Free PMC article.
-
Native Tissue Repairs for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Jan;18(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0648-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28155202 Review.
Cited by
-
Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic.Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Sep;25(9):1151-2. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2481-z. Int Urogynecol J. 2014. PMID: 25023779 No abstract available.
-
Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Nov;27(11):1619-1632. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3076-7. Epub 2016 Jul 5. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 27379891 Review.
-
Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery.Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Dec;17(12):87. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0642-y. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27771853 Review.
-
Tissue integrity and healing response in hypoestrogenic animal model treated by mesh implantation with addition of mesenchymal stem cell secretome.Open Vet J. 2025 Jan;15(1):162-170. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i1.15. Epub 2025 Jan 31. Open Vet J. 2025. PMID: 40092191 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous