Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 7;2014(3):CD009850.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009850.pub2.

High-flow nasal cannula therapy for respiratory support in children

Sara Mayfield  1 , Jacqueline Jauncey-Cooke, Judith L Hough, Andreas Schibler, Kristen Gibbons, Fiona Bogossian
Affiliations

High-flow nasal cannula therapy for respiratory support in children

Sara Mayfield et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Respiratory support is a central component of the management of critically ill children. It can be delivered invasively via an endotracheal tube or non-invasively via face mask, nasal mask, nasal cannula or oxygen hood/tent. Invasive ventilation can be damaging to the lungs, and the tendency to use non-invasive forms is growing. However, non-invasive delivery is often poorly tolerated by children. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen delivery is a relatively new therapy that shows the potential to reduce the need for intubation and be better tolerated by children than other non-invasive forms of support. HFNC therapy differs from other non-invasive forms of treatment in that it delivers heated, humidified and blended air/oxygen via nasal cannula at rates > 2 L/kg/min. This allows the user to deliver high concentrations of oxygen and to potentially deliver continuous distending pressure; this treatment often is better tolerated by the child.

Objectives: To determine whether HFNC therapy is more effective than other forms of non-invasive therapy in paediatric patients who require respiratory support.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 4); MEDLINE via PubMed (January 1966 to April 2013); EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2013); CINAHL (1982 to April 2013); and LILACS (1982 to April 2013). Abstracts from conference proceedings, theses and dissertations and bibliographical references to relevant studies were also searched. We applied no restriction on language.

Selection criteria: We planned to included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quas-randomized trials comparing HFNC therapy with other forms of non-invasive respiratory support for children. Non-invasive support encompassed cot, hood or tent oxygen; low-flow nasal cannulae (flow rates ≤ 2 L/min); and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) delivered via facial or nasal mask/cannula. Treatment failure was defined by the need for additional respiratory support. We excluded children with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed all studies for selection and data extraction. We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

Main results: Our search yielded 922 records. A total of 109 relevant records were retrieved with reference to our search criteria. After duplicates and irrelevant studies were removed, 69 studies were further scrutinized. Of these, 11 studies involved children. No study matched our inclusion criteria.

Authors' conclusions: Based on the results of this review, no evidence is available to allow determination of the safety or effectiveness of HFNC as a form of respiratory support in children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Sara Mayfield and Andreas Schibler have received financial and equipment support from Fisher Paykel Healthcare to conduct two observational studies involving HFNC therapy. These studies would not be eligible for inclusion in this review.

Jacqueline Jauncey‐Cooke: none known.

Judith L Hough: none known:

Kristen Gibbons: none known.

Fiona Bogossian: none known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009850

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Abboud 2012 {published data only}
    1. Abboud P, Roth P, Skiles C, Stolfi A, Rowin M. Predictors of failure in infants with viral bronchiolitis treated with high‐flow, high‐humidity nasal cannula therapy. Pediatric Critical Care 2012;13(6):e343‐9. [PUBMED: 22805160] - PubMed
Arora 2012 {published data only}
    1. Arora B, Mahajan P, Zidan M, Sethuraman U. Nasopharyngeal airway pressures in bronchiolitis patients treated with high‐flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. Pediatric Emergency Care 2012;28:1179‐84. [PUBMED: 23114244] - PubMed
Hedge 2013 {published data only}
    1. Hedge S, Prodhan P. Serious air leak syndrome complicating high‐flow nasal cannula therapy: a report of 3 cases. Pediatrics 2013;131(3):e1‐6. [PUBMED: 23382446] - PubMed
Hilliard 2012 {published data only}
    1. Hilliard T, Archer N, Hole L, Heraghty J, Cottis H, Mills K, et al. Pilot study of vapotherm oxygen delivery in moderately severe bronchiolitis. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2012;97:182‐3. [DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301151; PUBMED: 22100741] - DOI - PubMed
Hough 2011 {published data only}
    1. Hough JL, Pham TMT, Schibler A. Delivery of high flow nasal prong oxygen: the effect CPAP exposed. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Conference: 6th World Congress on Pediatric Critical Care. 2011; Vol. 12 (3 Suppl 1):A7.
McGinley 2009 {published data only}
    1. McGinley B, Halbower A, Schwartz AR, Smith PL, Patil SP, Schneider H. Effect of a high‐flow open nasal cannula system on obstructive sleep apnoea in children. Pediatrics 2009;124:179‐88. [PUBMED: 19564298] - PMC - PubMed
McKiernan 2010 {published data only}
    1. McKiernan C, Chua LC, Vistanier PF, Allen H. High flow nasal cannulae therapy in infants with bronchiolitis. Journal of Pediatrics 2010;156:634‐8. [PUBMED: 20036376 ] - PubMed
Milesi 2013 {published data only}
    1. Milesi C, Baleine J, Matecki S, Durand S, Combes C, Novais A, et al. Is treatment with a high flow nasal cannula effective in acute viral bronchiolitis? A physiologic study. Intensive Care Medicine 2013;39:1088‐94. [DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2879-y; PUBMED: 23494016] - DOI - PubMed
Schibler 2011 {published data only}
    1. Schibler A, Pham TMT, Dunster KR, Foster K, Barlow A, Gibbons K, et al. Reduced intubation rates for infants after introduction of high flow nasal prong oxygen delivery. Intensive Care Medicine 2011;3:847‐52. [PUBMED: 21369809] - PubMed
Spentzas 2009 {published data only}
    1. Spentzas T, Minarik M, Patters AB, Vinson B, Stidham G. Children with respiratory distress treated with high‐flow nasal cannula. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2009;24(5):323‐8. [PUBMED: 19703816] - PubMed
Wing 2012 {published data only}
    1. Wing R, James C, Maranda L, Armsby C. Use of high‐flow nasal cannula support in the emergency department reduces the need for intubation in pediatric acute respiratory insufficiency. Pediatric Emergency Care 2012;28:1117‐23. [PUBMED: 23114231] - PubMed

Additional references

Beggs 2012
    1. Beggs, Wong ZH, Kaul S, Ogden KJ, Walters JAE. High‐flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009609] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Campbell 2006
    1. Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, Kelly EN. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology 2006;26:546‐9. [PUBMED: 16837929] - PubMed
Corley 2012
    1. Corley A, Rickard CM, Aitken LM, Johnston A, Barnett A, Fraser JF. High flow nasal cannulae for respiratory support in adult intensive care patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172; CD10172] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Dahlem 2003
    1. Dahlem P, Aalderen WM, Hamaker ME, Dijkfraaf MG, Bos AP. Incidence and short‐term outcome of acute lung injury in mechanically ventilated children. European Respiratory Journal 2003;22(6):980‐5. [PUBMED: 14680089] - PubMed
Dysart 2009
    1. Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH. Reserach in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respiratory Medicine 2009;103:1400‐5. [PUBMED: 19467849] - PubMed
Frey 2001
    1. Frey B, McQuillan PJ, Shann F, Freezer N. Nasopharyngeal oxygen therapy produces positive end‐expiratory pressure in infants. European Journal of Pediatrics 2001;160:556‐60. [PUBMED: 11585079 ] - PubMed
Frey 2003
    1. Frey B, Shann F. Oxygen administration in infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2003;88(2):84‐8. [PUBMED: 12598492] - PMC - PubMed
Glossop 2012
    1. Glossop AJ, Shepherd N, Bryden DC, Mills GH. Non‐invasive ventilation for weaning, avoiding reintubation after extubation and in the postoperative period: a meta‐analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2012;109(3):305‐314. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes305; PUBMED: 22879654] - DOI - PubMed
Guyatt 2008
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck‐Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ 2008;336:995‐8. [PUBMED: 18456631] - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] . The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Klein 1986
    1. Klein M, Reynolds LG. Relief of sleep‐related oropharyngeal airway obstruction by continuous insufflation of the pharynx. Lancet 1986;1:935‐9. [PUBMED: 2871240] - PubMed
Kopelman 2003
    1. Kopelman AE, Holbert D. Use of oxygen cannulas in extremely low birthweight infants is associated with mucosal trauma and bleeding, and possibly with coagulase‐negative staphylococcal sepsis. Journal of Perinatology 2003;23:94‐7. [PUBMED: 12673256] - PubMed
Kubicka 2008
    1. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnell RA. Heated humidified high‐flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure?. Pediatrics 2008;121:82‐8. [PUBMED: 18166560] - PubMed
Lampland 2009
    1. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Mammel MC. Observational study of humidified high flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Journal of Pediatrics 2009;154:177‐82. [PUBMED: 18760803] - PubMed
Lee 2013
    1. Lee JH, Rehder KJ, Williford L, Cheifetz IM, Turner DA. Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children and adults: a critical review of the literature. Intensive Care Medicine 2013;39:247‐57. [DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2743-5; PUBMED: 23143331] - DOI - PubMed
Mayfield 2013
    1. Mayfield S, Jauncey‐Cook J, Bogossian F. A case series of paediatric high flow nasal cannula therapy. Australian Critical Care 2013;26:189‐92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.05.004; PUBMED: 23891472] - DOI - PubMed
Reid 1984
    1. Reid LM. Lung growth in health and disease. British Journal of Diseases of the Chest 1984;78:113‐4. [PUBMED: 6372845] - PubMed
RevMan 5.2 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Roca 2010
    1. Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans J. High‐flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respiratory Care 2010;55(4):408‐13. [PUBMED: 20406507] - PubMed
Shoemaker 2007
    1. Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. Journal of Perinatology 2007;27:85‐91. [PUBMED: 17262040 ] - PubMed
Spence 2007
    1. Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, McGonigle R, Kilani RA. High flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. Journal of Perinatology 2007;27:772‐5. [PUBMED: 17762844 ] - PubMed
Sreenan 2001
    1. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson‐Mason A, Osiovich H. High‐flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnoea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics 2001;107:1081‐3. [PUBMED: 11331690] - PubMed
Sutton 2008
    1. Sutton AH, HIggins JP. Recent developments in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2008;27:625‐50. [PUBMED: 17590884] - PubMed
The ARDS Network 2000
    1. The ARDS Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;342:1301‐8. [PUBMED: 10793162] - PubMed
Thorsteinsson 2002
    1. Thorsteinsson A, Werner O, Jonmaker C, Larsson A. Airway closure in anaesthetized infants and children: the influence of inspiratory pressures and volumes. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2002;46:529‐36. [PUBMED: 12027847] - PubMed
Wilkinson 2008
    1. Wilkinson DJ, Anderson CC, Smith K, Holberton J. Pharyngeal pressure with high‐flow nasal cannulae in premature infants. Journal of Perinatology 2008;28:42‐7. [PUBMED: 17989697 ] - PubMed
Wilkinson 2011
    1. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O'Donnell CPF, Paoli AG. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub2; PUBMED: 21563154 ] - DOI - PubMed
Yong 2005
    1. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Archives of Diseases in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F480‐3. [PUBMED: 15941825 ] - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Mayfield 2012
    1. Mayfield S, Jauncey‐Cooke J, Hough JL, Schibler A, Gibbons K, Bogossian F. High flow nasal cannula therapy for respiratory support in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009850] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources