First experience of the use of the C-MAC PM videolaryngoscope in a clinical setting by anesthetic nurses: a comparison with anesthetists
- PMID: 24605416
First experience of the use of the C-MAC PM videolaryngoscope in a clinical setting by anesthetic nurses: a comparison with anesthetists
Abstract
Background: The Storz C-MAC videolaryngoscope has been found to facilitate endotracheal intubation and to be easy to use by novice users. However, it has never been studied in those who will probably use it most, anesthetists and anesthetic nurses. The aim of the present study was to identify the number of attempts needed before the participants were able to intubate 2 consecutive patients within 30 seconds.
Methods: Following a didactic session, 22 anesthetists and 21 anesthetic nurses were included in the study and attempted to intubate 184 patients with predicted easy laryngoscopy scheduled to undergo elective surgery. The number of attempts before achieving 2 consecutive successful intubations and time to intubation were recorded for both groups of participants. Perception of ease of use for the device was also recorded.
Results: Overall, anesthetic nurses required more attempts before achieving 2 consecutive successful intubations (5.9 +/- 3.24 vs 2.73+/- 1.67, p < 0.0005). They also had significantly more failures until 2 consecutive successful intubations were achieved, compared to anesthetists (4.1 +/- 2.8 vs 1.32 +/- 1.25, p < 0.0005). A significantly higher percentage of anesthetic nurses required more than 3 attempts before achieving 2 consecutive intubations (75% vs 36%, p = 0.016). Regarding the intubation time, no significant differences were recorded between specialties. Anesthetic nurses assessed the C-MAC as easier to use than anesthetists did.
Conclusions: This is the first clinical study assessing the use of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anesthetists and anesthetic nurses indicating that it is easy to learn and to use in their hands.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.Anaesthesia. 2010 May;65(5):483-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06307.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19. Anaesthesia. 2010. PMID: 20337620 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing the novel GlideScope Groove videolaryngoscope with conventional videolaryngoscopy: a randomized mannequin study of novice providers.J Clin Anesth. 2013 Dec;25(8):644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Oct 4. J Clin Anesth. 2013. PMID: 24095892 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):629-36. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea34. Anesthesiology. 2012. PMID: 22261795 Clinical Trial.
-
Review article: video-laryngoscopy: another tool for difficult intubation or a new paradigm in airway management?Can J Anaesth. 2013 Feb;60(2):184-91. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9859-5. Epub 2012 Dec 12. Can J Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23233395 Review.
-
Limitations of the Videolaryngoscope: An Anesthetic Management Reality.Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Fall;55(1):97-104. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000130. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2017. PMID: 27930418 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Use of a Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Approach in Difficult Airways Management: A Pilot Simulation Study.Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Dec;47(6):464-470. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.99234. Epub 2019 Sep 2. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019. PMID: 31828243 Free PMC article.
-
Video screen visualization patterns when using a video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 6;3(1):e12630. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12630. eCollection 2022 Feb. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022. PMID: 35028640 Free PMC article. Review.