Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Dec;28(12):1707-15.
doi: 10.1111/jdv.12377. Epub 2014 Mar 8.

Efficacy, patient-reported outcomes and safety profile of ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid), an injectable drug for the reduction of unwanted submental fat: results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Clinical Trial

Efficacy, patient-reported outcomes and safety profile of ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid), an injectable drug for the reduction of unwanted submental fat: results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study

B Ascher et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Unwanted submental fat (SMF) may result in an unattractive chin profile and dissatisfaction with appearance. An approved and rigorously tested non-surgical method for SMF reduction is lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATX-101 for the pharmacological reduction of unwanted SMF in a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Methods: Patients (n = 360) with moderate or severe SMF were randomized to receive ATX-101 1 or 2 mg/cm(2) or placebo injected into their SMF for up to four treatments ~28 days apart, with a 12-week follow-up. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of treatment responders, defined as a ≥1-point reduction in SMF on the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS), and those satisfied with their appearance in association with their face and chin after treatment on the Subject Self-Rating Scale (SSRS score ≥4). Secondary efficacy endpoints included a ≥1-point improvement in SMF on the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS) and changes in the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Impact Scale (PR-SMFIS). Additional patient-reported outcomes and changes in the Skin Laxity Rating Scale were recorded. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory test results were monitored.

Results: Compared with placebo, a greater proportion of patients treated with ATX-101 1 and 2 mg/cm(2) showed a ≥1-point improvement in CR-SMFRS (58.3% and 62.3%, respectively, vs. 34.5% with placebo; P < 0.001) and patient satisfaction (SSRS score ≥4) with the appearance of their face and chin (68.3% and 64.8%, respectively, vs. 29.3%; P < 0.001). Patient-reported secondary efficacy endpoints showed significant improvements in SMF severity (PR-SMFRS; P = 0.009 for ATX-101 1 mg/cm(2) , P < 0.001 for ATX-101 2 mg/cm(2) vs. placebo) and emotions and perceived self-image (PR-SMFIS; P < 0.001). No overall worsening of skin laxity was observed. AEs were mostly transient, mild to moderate in intensity and localized to the treatment area.

Conclusion: ATX-101 was effective and well tolerated, and may be an alternative to surgery for patients desiring improvement of their submental profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic disposition of randomized patients into different treatment groups. AE, adverse event.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of responders* to treatment at Visit 7 (12 weeks after the final treatment). Intention-to-treat population. *≥1-point reduction in submental fat on the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale; last observation carried forward; OR = 2.60 (95% CI 1.52–4.43), binary logistic regression (< 0.001, Bonferroni–Holm testing procedure); §OR = 3.13 (95% CI 1.83–5.36), binary logistic regression (< 0.001, Bonferroni–Holm testing procedure). CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of patients satisfied with the appearance of their face and chin* at Visit 7 (12 weeks after the final treatment). Intention-to-treat population. *Score ≥4 of a maximum of 6 on the Subject Self-Rating Scale; last observation carried forward; OR = 5.37 (95% CI 3.06–9.44), binary logistic regression (< 0.001, Bonferroni–Holm testing procedure); §OR = 4.62 (95% CI 2.65–8.04), binary logistic regression (< 0.001, Bonferroni–Holm testing procedure). CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative images of the aspect of the SMF of patients before (at baseline) and after treatment (Visit 7) with ATX-101 2 mg/cm2 (a, b) and 1 mg/cm2 (c, d). CR-SMFRS, Clinician-Reported SMF Rating Scale; SSRS, Subject Self-Rating Scale; SMF, submental fat.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Proportion of patients with an improvement in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS) score from baseline to Visit 7 (12 weeks after the final treatment). Intention-to-treat population. *= 0.009; P < 0.001 relative to placebo (Pearson's chi-square test).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Change in patient evaluations of the psychological impact of their submental fat (Patient-Reported Submental Fat Impact Scale [PR-SMFIS] component scores) from baseline to Visit 7 (12 weeks after the final treatment). Intention-to-treat population. *< 0.001 relative to placebo (analysis of variance and post hoc Fisher's least significant difference tests).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site (incidence ≥10%). Percentages are based on the number of patients in the safety population.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Honigman R, Castle DJ. Aging and cosmetic enhancement. Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1:115–119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rzany B, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, et al. Validated composite assessment scales for the global face. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:294–308. - PubMed
    1. Ascher B. Developments in management of facial and body lipoatrophy with exogenous volumetric injectables. In: Landau M, Rossi B, editors. Injection Treatments in Cosmetic Surgery (Ascher B) London, UK: Informa Healthcare; 2008. pp. 329–338.
    1. Burgess CM. Principles of soft tissue augmentation for the aging face. Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1:349–355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greco TM, Antunes MB, Yellin SA. Injectable fillers for volume replacement in the aging face. Facial Plast Surg. 2012;28:8–20. - PubMed

Publication types