Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;135(3):EL159-65.
doi: 10.1121/1.4865263.

Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization

Affiliations

Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization

Christina D Fuller et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar.

Erratum in

  • J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jun;135(6):3641

Abstract

Musicians have been shown to better perceive pitch and timbre cues in speech and music, compared to non-musicians. It is unclear whether this "musician advantage" persists under conditions of spectro-temporal degradation, as experienced by cochlear-implant (CI) users. In this study, gender categorization was measured in normal-hearing musicians and non-musicians listening to acoustic CI simulations. Recordings of Dutch words were synthesized to systematically vary fundamental frequency, vocal-tract length, or both to create voices from the female source talker to a synthesized male talker. Results showed an overall musician effect, mainly due to musicians weighting fundamental frequency more than non-musicians in CI simulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Power spectrum and waveform of the vowel /u/ in “bus”. Each row represents a different voice. The middle row shows the stimulus resynthesized, in STRAIGHT, with the original parameters of the recorded female voice. In the top row, only the F0 was changed, by an octave down. In the bottom row, only the VTL was changed to be made 23% longer, which results in shifting all the formants down by 3.6 st. The left panel shows the spectra over the duration of the vowel, for the vocoded (right column) and non-vocoded (left column, noted “Original”) versions of the stimulus. The black solid line represents the spectrum itself, making the harmonics and/or the sinusoidal carriers (and sidebands) of the vocoder visible. The dashed gray line represents the spectral envelope, as extracted by STRAIGHT on the left, and interpolating between the carriers for the vocoded sounds on the right. The triangles and stems point to the location of the first three formants, as defined by visual inspection of the STRAIGHT envelope, both for the left and right columns. In the right column, the vocoder analysis filter bands are shown with grayed areas. The frequency of the sine-wave carrier is marked with a dotted line.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Mean gender categorization (across subjects and test words) shown for non-musicians (left panels) and musicians (right panels) tested with unprocessed (but synthesized) stimuli, as a function of the difference in F0 (top plots) or VTL (bottom plots) relative to the female source talker. Error bars denote one standard error of the mean.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Mean gender categorization (across subjects and test words) shown for non-musicians (left panels) and musicians (right panels) tested with the CI simulation, as a function of the difference in F0 (top plots) or VTL (bottom plots) relative to the female source talker. Error bars denote one error of the mean.

References

    1. Besson, M., Chobert, J., and Marie, C. (2011). “ Transfer of training between music and speech: Common processing, attention, and memory,” Front. Psychol. 2, 94.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosman, A. J. , and Smoorenburg, G. F. (1995). “ Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment,” Audiol. 5, 260–284 - PubMed
    1. Brungart, D. S. (2001). “ Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1101–110910.1121/1.1345696 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chartrand, J. P. , and Belin, P. (2006). “ Superior voice timbre processing in musicians,” Neurosci. Lett. 3, 164–16710.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.053 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deguchi, C., Boureux, M., Sarlo, M., Besson, M., Grassi, M., Schon, D., and Colombo, L. (2012). “ Sentence pitch change detection in the native and unfamiliar language in musicians and non-musicians: behavioral, electrophysiological and psychoacoustic study,” Brain Res. 1455, 75–8910.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.034 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types