Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep;271(9):2469-79.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-2966-x. Epub 2014 Mar 9.

European Laryngological Society: ELS recommendations for the follow-up of patients treated for laryngeal cancer

Affiliations
Review

European Laryngological Society: ELS recommendations for the follow-up of patients treated for laryngeal cancer

Ricard Simo et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

It is accepted that the follow-up of patients who had treatment for laryngeal cancer is a fundamental part of their care. The reasons of post-treatment follow-up include evaluation of treatment response, early identification of recurrence, early detection of new primary tumours, monitoring and management of complications, optimisation of rehabilitation, promotion smoking and excessive alcohol cessation, provision of support to patients and their families, patient counselling and education. Controversies exist in how these aims are achieved. Increasing efforts are being made to rationalise the structure and timing of head and neck cancer follow-up clinics. The aim of this document is to analyse the current evidence for the need to follow up patients who have been treated for LC and provide an up to date, evidence-based statement which is meaningful and applicable to all European Health Care Systems. A working group of the Head and Neck Cancer Committee of the ELS was constituted in 2009. A review of the current published literature on the management and follow-up of laryngeal cancer was undertaken and statements are made based on critical appraisal of the literature and best current evidence. Category recommendations were based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Statements include: length, frequency, setting, type of health professional, clinical assessment, screening investigations, patient's education, second primary tumours, and mode of treatment considerations including radiotherapy, chemo-radiation therapy, transoral surgery and open surgery. It also addresses specific recommendations regarding patients with persistent pain, new imaging techniques, tumour markers and narrow band imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jun-Jul;28(6):1146-52 - PubMed
    1. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 May;270(5):1569-80 - PubMed
    1. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73(1):38-46 - PubMed
    1. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2001 Jun;1(1):125-33 - PubMed
    1. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul;270(7):1981-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources