Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;27(7):784-798.
doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.751579. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

"Penguins don't fly": An investigation into the effect of typicality on picture naming in people with aphasia

Clare Rossiter  1 , Wendy Best  2
Affiliations
Free PMC article

"Penguins don't fly": An investigation into the effect of typicality on picture naming in people with aphasia

Clare Rossiter et al. Aphasiology. 2013 Jul.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: PREVIOUS RESEARCH HAS HIGHLIGHTED PSYCHOLINGUISTIC VARIABLES INFLUENCING NAMING ABILITY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH APHASIA, INCLUDING: familiarity, frequency, age of acquisition, imageability, operativity, and length (Nickels & Howard, 1995) and a potential link between typicality and generalisation to untreated items in intervention (Kiran, Sandberg, & Sebastian, 2011). However, the effect of concept typicality (the extent to which an item can be considered a prototype of a category) on naming in aphasia warrants further examination.

Aims: To investigate first whether typicality can be reliably rated across a range of natural semantic categories and second whether, and if so in which direction, typicality influences naming performance for people with aphasia. To provide quantitative and qualitative information on typicality for a set of stimuli for use in future research.

Methods & procedures: Typicality ratings were obtained and the results compared with those in the existing literature. The influence of typicality on picture naming was investigated employing both matched sets (high and low typicality matched for other psycholinguistic variables) and logistic regression analyses for the group and individual participants with aphasia (n = 20).

Outcomes & results: Typicality rating correlated strongly with ratings obtained in previous research (Rosch, 1975: r = .798, N = 35, p < .001; Uyeda & Mandler, 1980: r = .844, N = 47, p < .001). Typicality was a significant predictor of picture naming for the group and some individuals, with generally better performance for typical items. This was demonstrated in both matched sets and regression analyses. However, other psycholinguistic variables proved more strongly related to naming success, particularly age of acquisition.

Conclusions: Typicality can be rated reliably and should be considered alongside other psycholinguistic variables when investigating word retrieval and intervention in aphasia. Further research is necessary to accurately model the direction of typicality effects found in word retrieval. Finally, the differing nature, size, and internal structure of categories require further exploration when investigating typicality effects.

Keywords: Anomia; Naming; Typicality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentage of correct responses across both naming attempts (out of 78 items) for high and low typicality sets.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Battig W., Montague W. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Monograph. 1969;80:1–46.
    1. Best W., Greenwood A., Grassly J., Hickin J. Bridging the gap: Can impairment-based therapy for anomia have an impact at the psycho-social level? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2008;43:390–407. - PubMed
    1. Bozeat S., Lambon Ralph M. A., Graham K. S., Patterson K., Wilkin H., Rowland J. A duck with four legs: Investigating the structure of conceptual knowledge using picture drawing in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2003;20:27–47. - PubMed
    1. CELEX, Centre for Lexical Information. The Celex database. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics; 1993.
    1. Collins A. M., Loftus E. F. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review. 1975;82:407–428.

LinkOut - more resources