Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;51(5):407-11.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12193. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

Not just noise: individual differences in general startle reactivity predict startle response to uncertain and certain threat

Affiliations

Not just noise: individual differences in general startle reactivity predict startle response to uncertain and certain threat

Daniel E Bradford et al. Psychophysiology. 2014 May.

Abstract

General startle reactivity reflects defensive reactivity independent of affective foreground. We examined the relationship between general startle reactivity and startle response to threat in three tasks with distinct manipulations of threat uncertainty. General startle reactivity was a stronger predictor of startle response during threat (vs. no threat) and uncertain (vs. certain threat). These results confirm that including general startle reactivity in our analyses can increase the power and/or precision to test effects of other focal experimental manipulations or grouping variables. Moreover, this suggests that individual differences in defensive reactivity moderate responding to threats of various types in our environment. As such, individual differences in general startle reactivity may index important psychological attributes related to trait affectivity, premorbid vulnerability for psychopathology, and manifest psychopathology.

Keywords: Anxiety; EMG; Individual differences; Startle blink.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Startle Response by General Startle Reactivity and Condition
Gray bands indicate confidence envelopes (+/− one standard error) for point estimates of startle response from the general linear model (GLM). We included a strip plot of General startle reactivity for all participants along each x-axis. We report GLM coefficients for the simple effects in each condition. Panel A displays aggregate data across the three tasks. Panels B-D display data separately for the three tasks.

References

    1. Blumenthal T, Cuthbert B, Filion D, Hackley S, Lipp O, van Boxtel A. Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies. Psychophysiology. 2005;42(1):1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00271.x. - PubMed
    1. Bradford D, Shapiro B, Curtin J. How bad could it be? Alcohol dampens stress responses to uncertain intensity threat. Psychological Science. 2013;24(12):2541–2549. doi:10.1177/0956797613499923. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis M, Walker D, Miles L, Grillon C. Phasic vs sustained fear in rats and humans: role of the extended amygdala in fear vs anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):105–135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gloria R. Doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2011. Uncovering a potential biological marker for marijuana withdrawal: Startle potentiation to threat.
    1. Hefner K, Curtin J. Alcohol stress response dampening: Selective reduction of anxiety in the face of uncertain threat. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2012;26:232–244. doi:10.1177/0269881111416691. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources