Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction: pharmacologic
- PMID: 24614812
- DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000024
Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction: pharmacologic
Abstract
Over the years, multiple forms and doses of pharmacologic agents have been used for cervical ripening and labor induction. This chapter will review potential criteria and article situations for choosing a particular pharmacologic agent. The discussion in this chapter will be limited to comparisons between pharmacologic agents; direct comparisons between mechanical agents and pharmacologic agents will largely be reviewed in the accompanying article: Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction: mechanical. For the purposes of this discussion, the term labor induction will be limited to patients with a "favorable cervix" by Bishop's score <6, whereas the term cervical ripening will be limited to patients with an unfavorable cervix and includes subsequent induction or augmentation of labor. Although the pharmacologic agent used for the initial cervical ripening process is the focus of this discussion, subsequent treatment with oxytocin may or may not be required for delivery.
Similar articles
-
Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S669-S695. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Jul 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38462252 Review.
-
Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.Tenn Med. 2001 Jan;94(1):25-7. Tenn Med. 2001. PMID: 11194687 Clinical Trial.
-
Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.Am Fam Physician. 2003 May 15;67(10):2123-8. Am Fam Physician. 2003. PMID: 12776961 Review.
-
Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;105(3):466-72. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152341.31873.d9. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15738009 Clinical Trial.
-
Current pharmacotherapy options for labor induction.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Oct;13(14):2005-14. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.722622. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012. PMID: 22963686 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of different sonographic cervical measures to predict labor induction outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):8462-8477. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-507. Epub 2023 Nov 21. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023. PMID: 38106269 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of inflammation by lipid mediators in oral diseases.Oral Dis. 2017 Jul;23(5):576-597. doi: 10.1111/odi.12544. Epub 2016 Aug 4. Oral Dis. 2017. PMID: 27426637 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent advances in the induction of labor.F1000Res. 2019 Oct 30;8:F1000 Faculty Rev-1829. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17587.1. eCollection 2019. F1000Res. 2019. PMID: 31723412 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources