Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):36-46.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu019. Epub 2014 Mar 9.

A checklist for patient safety rounds at the care pathway level

Cordula Wagner  1 , Caroline A Thompson, Onyebuchi A Arah, Oliver Groene, Niek S Klazinga, Maral Dersarkissian, Rosa Suñol; DUQuE Project Consortium
Collaborators, Affiliations

A checklist for patient safety rounds at the care pathway level

Cordula Wagner et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To define a checklist that can be used to assess the performance of a department and evaluate the implementation of quality management (QM) activities across departments or pathways in acute care hospitals.

Design: We developed and tested a checklist for the assessment of QM activities at department level in a cross-sectional study using on-site visits by trained external auditors.

Setting and participants: A sample of 292 hospital departments of 74 acute care hospitals across seven European countries. In every hospital, four departments for the conditions: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, hip fracture and deliveries participated.

Main outcome measures: Four measures of QM activities were evaluated at care pathway level focusing on specialized expertise and responsibility (SER), evidence-based organization of pathways (EBOP), patient safety strategies and clinical review (CR).

Results: Participating departments attained mean values on the various scales between 1.2 and 3.7. The theoretical range was 0-4. Three of the four QM measures are identical for the four conditions, whereas one scale (EBOP) has condition-specific items. Correlations showed that every factor was related, but also distinct, and added to the overall picture of QM at pathway level.

Conclusion: The newly developed checklist can be used across various types of departments and pathways in acute care hospitals like AMI, deliveries, stroke and hip fracture. The anticipated users of the checklist are internal (e.g. peers within the hospital and hospital executive board) and external auditors (e.g. healthcare inspectorate, professional or patient organizations).

Keywords: external quality assessment; hospital care; measurement of quality; professions; quality improvement; quality management; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Weaver SJ, Lubomski LH, Wilson RF, et al. Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:369–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Neilands TB, et al. The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: a randomized trial of clinical units. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frankel A, Grillo SP, Pittman M, et al. Revealing and resolving patient safety defects the impact of leadership walkrounds on frontline caregiver assessments of patient safety. HSR. 2008;43:2050–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwendimann R, Milne J, Frush K, et al. A closer look at associations between hospital leadership walkrounds and patient safety climate and risk reduction: a cross-sectional study. Am J Med Qual. 2013;X:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Groene O, Klazinga N, Wagner C, et al. Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe Research Project. Investigating organizational quality improvement systems, patient empowerment, organizational culture, professional involvement and the quality of care in European hospitals: the ‘Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE)’ project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:281. - PMC - PubMed