Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Sep;23(9):1005-13.
doi: 10.1002/pon.3508. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer

Jennifer Barsky Reese et al. Psychooncology. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: We previously developed and piloted a telephone-based intimacy enhancement (IE) intervention addressing sexual concerns of colorectal cancer patients and their partners in an uncontrolled study. The current study tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the IE intervention in a randomized, controlled trial.

Methods: Twenty-three couples were randomized to either the four-session IE condition or to a wait list control condition and completed sexual and relationship outcomes measures. The IE intervention teaches skills for coping with sexual concerns and improving intimacy. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through enrollment and post-treatment program evaluations, respectively. Effect sizes were calculated by comparing differences in average pre/post change scores across completers in the two groups (n = 18 couples).

Results: Recruitment and attrition data supported feasibility. Program evaluations for process (e.g., ease of participation) and content (e.g., relevance) demonstrated acceptability. Engaging in intimacy-building activities and communication were the skills rated as most commonly practiced and most helpful. For patients, positive effects of the IE intervention were found for female and male sexual function, medical impact on sexual function, and self-efficacy for enjoying intimacy (≥.58); no effects were found on sexual distress or intimacy and small negative effects for sexual communication, and two self-efficacy items. For partners, positive IE effects were found for all outcomes; the largest were for sexual distress (.69), male sexual function (1.76), communication (.97), and two self-efficacy items (≥.87).

Conclusions: The telephone-based IE intervention shows promise for couples facing colorectal cancer. Larger multi-site intervention studies are necessary to replicate findings.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; couple therapy; feasibility studies; sexual dysfunctions; sexuality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relationships that might bias this work or any conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study consort diagram

References

    1. Bober SL, Sanchez Varela V. Sexuality in adult cancer survivors: challenges and intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3712–3719. - PubMed
    1. Traa MJ, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Den Oudsten BL. Sexual (dys)function and the quality of sexual life in patients with colorectal cancer a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:19–27. - PubMed
    1. Chorost MI, Weber TK, Lee RJ, et al. Sexual dysfunction, informed consent and multi-modality therapy for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:271–274. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Kuchler T, et al. Ten-year historic cohort of quality of life and sexuality in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:483–492. - PubMed
    1. Gervaz P, Bucher P, Konrad B, et al. A prospective longitudinal evaluation of quality of life after abdominoperineal resection. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:14–19. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms