Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting
- PMID: 24618962
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.1362
Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting
Comment in
-
Bad science, sloppy reporting, and retracted publications: should peer review be the scapegoat?Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Jun;35(6):411-2. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.907685. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014. PMID: 24857524 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials.JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1045-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1361. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24618966
-
Reporting of results in ClinicalTrials.gov and high-impact journals.JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1063-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285634. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24618969 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Study design, publication outcome, and funding of research presented at international congresses on peer review and biomedical publication.JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1065-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.143. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24618970 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical