Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;37(4):397-400.
doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000172. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on refractory neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury

Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on refractory neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury

Bilge Yılmaz et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the analgesic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on intractable neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: A single center, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.

Setting: SCI rehabilitation unit of university rehabilitation center.

Participants: Seventeen patients with SCI and chronic neuropathic pain who met the inclusion criteria recruited between April 2010 and January 2012.

Interventions: Ten daily treatment sessions of real or sham rTMS (30 trains of 10-Hz stimuli for a duration of 5 seconds; a total of 1500 pulses at intensity equal to 110% of the resting motor threshold) was applied over vertex using a figure-of-8-shaped coil.

Outcome measures: Pain was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and 10 days, 6 weeks and 6 months after the treatment. Patients' satisfactions obtained using a 5-point Likert scale at 6 months.

Results: Both real and sham rTMS provided a significant reduction in the VAS scores (real rTMS group, P = 0.004; sham rTMS group, P = 0.020). Post hoc analysis revealed the significant difference was at 10 days and 6 weeks compared to baseline in the real rTMS group and only at 10 days compared to baseline in the sham rTMS group. Comparison of VAS scores and patient satisfaction did not show any significant difference at each assessment point (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated analgesic effect of rTMS on intractable neuropathic pain in SCI was not superior to placebo. However, middle-term (over 6 weeks) pain relief by rTMS is encouraging and suggests the need for future studies with a larger sample size.

Keywords: Pain; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Spinal cord injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in the VAS scores over time. There was a significant reduction in the VAS scores for both groups (real rTMS group, P = 0.004; sham rTMS group, P = 0.020). (*Post hoc analysis showed the reduction was significant at 10 days and 6 weeks compared to baseline in the real rTMS group [1A] and was significant only at 10 days compared to baseline in the sham rTMS group [1B]). rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; VAS, visual analogue scale.

References

    1. Cardenas DD, Felix ER. Pain after spinal cord injury: a review of classification, treatment approaches, and treatment assessment. PM R 2009;1(12):1077–90 - PubMed
    1. Cardenas DD, Jensen MP. Treatments for chronic pain in persons with spinal cord injury: a survey study. J Spinal Cord Med 2006;29(2):109–17 - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. A report of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2011;47(2):309–16 - PubMed
    1. Leung A, Donohue M, Xu R, Lee R, Lefaucheur JP, Khedr EM, et al. . rTMS for suppressing neuropathic pain: a meta-analysis. J Pain 2009;10(12):1205–16 - PubMed
    1. Defrin R, Grunhaus L, Zamir D, Zeilig G. The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(12):1574–80 - PubMed

Publication types