Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Jun;32(6):1170-7.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000146.

Hypertension in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Meta-Analysis

Hypertension in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension

Raghupathy Anchala et al. J Hypertens. 2014 Jun.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: A region-specific (urban and rural parts of north, east, west, and south India) systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension among Indian patients have not been done before.

Methods: Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 1950 to 30 April 2013 were searched for 'prevalence, burden, awareness, and control of blood pressure (BP) or hypertension (≥140 SBP and or ≥90 DBP) among Indian adults' (≥18 years). Of the total 3047 articles, 142 were included.

Results: Overall prevalence for hypertension in India was 29.8% (95% confidence interval: 26.7-33.0). Significant differences in hypertension prevalence were noted between rural and urban parts [27.6% (23.2-32.0) and 33.8% (29.7-37.8); P = 0.05]. Regional estimates for the prevalence of hypertension were as follows: 14.5% (13.3-15.7), 31.7% (30.2-33.3), 18.1% (16.9-19.2), and 21.1% (20.1-22.0) for rural north, east, west, and south India; and 28.8% (26.9-30.8), 34.5% (32.6-36.5), 35.8% (35.2-36.5), and 31.8% (30.4-33.1) for urban north, east, west, and south India, respectively. Overall estimates for the prevalence of awareness, treatment, and control of BP were 25.3% (21.4-29.3), 25.1% (17.0-33.1), and 10.7% (6.5-15.0) for rural Indians; and 42.0% (35.2-48.9), 37.6% (24.0-51.2), and 20.2% (11.6-28.7) for urban Indians.

Conclusion: About 33% urban and 25% rural Indians are hypertensive. Of these, 25% rural and 42% urban Indians are aware of their hypertensive status. Only 25% rural and 38% of urban Indians are being treated for hypertension. One-tenth of rural and one-fifth of urban Indian hypertensive population have their BP under control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram for selection of studies.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Overall pooled estimates: region-wise (north, east, west, and south) and place-wise (rural and urban). P value for overall rural and urban differences in hypertension (HTN) prevalence = 0.05; P value for rural and urban differences in HTN prevalence for east India = 0.98; P value for rural and urban differences in HTN prevalence for north India = 0.07; P value for rural and urban differences in HTN prevalence for south India = 0.62; P value for rural and urban differences in HTN prevalence for west India = 0.05. CI, confidence interval. Statistically significant.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Percentage aware, treated, and under control for hypertension (HTN): urban and rural areas. P value for overall rural and urban differences in awareness of hypertension = 0.002; P value for rural and urban differences in HTN treatment = 0.112; P value for rural and urban differences in HTN control = 0.03. BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; ES, pooled estimate; Statistically significant.

Comment in

  • Hypertension in India.
    Li C, Kelly TN. Li C, et al. J Hypertens. 2014 Jun;32(6):1189-91. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000158. J Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 24781507 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380:2224–2260 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leeder S, Raymond S, Greenberg H, Liu H. A race against time. The challenge of cardiovascular disease in developing economies. New York:Columbia University; 2004
    1. Srinath Reddy K, Shah B, Varghese C, Ramadoss A. Responding to the threat of chronic diseases in India. Lancet 2005; 366:1744–1749 - PubMed
    1. Gupta R. Trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18:73–78 - PubMed
    1. Mackay J, Mensah G. Atlas of heart disease and stroke. Geneva:World Health Organization; 2004

Publication types