What proportion of symptomatic side effects in patients taking statins are genuinely caused by the drug? Systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials to aid individual patient choice
- PMID: 24623264
- DOI: 10.1177/2047487314525531
What proportion of symptomatic side effects in patients taking statins are genuinely caused by the drug? Systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials to aid individual patient choice
Abstract
Objective: Discussions about statin efficacy in cardiovascular prevention are always based on data from blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing statin to placebo; however, discussion of side effects is not. Clinicians often assume symptoms occurring with statins are caused by statins, encouraging discontinuation. We test this assumption and calculate an evidence-based estimate of the probability of a symptom being genuinely attributable to the statin itself.
Methods: We identified RCTs comparing statin to placebo for cardiovascular prevention that reported side effects separately in the two arms.
Results: Among 14 primary prevention trials (46,262 participants), statin therapy increased diabetes by absolute risk of 0.5% (95% CI 0.1-1%, p = 0.012), meanwhile reducing death by a similar extent: -0.5% (-0.9 to -0.2%, p = 0.003). In the 15 secondary prevention RCTs (37,618 participants), statins decreased death by 1.4% (-2.1 to -0.7%, p < 0.001). There were no other statin-attributable symptoms, although asymptomatic liver transaminase elevation was 0.4% more frequent with statins across all trials. Serious adverse events and withdrawals were similar in both arms.
Conclusions: Only a small minority of symptoms reported on statins are genuinely due to the statins: almost all would occur just as frequently on placebo. Only development of new-onset diabetes mellitus was significantly higher on statins than placebo; nevertheless only 1 in 5 of new cases were actually caused by statins. Higher statin doses produce a detectable effect, but even still the proportion attributable to statins is variable: for asymptomatic liver enzyme elevation, the majority are attributable to the higher dose; in contrast for muscle aches, the majority are not.
Keywords: Adverse events; meta-analysis; side-effects; statins.
Comment in
-
Statins may have fewer side effects than is claimed, meta-analysis finds.BMJ. 2014 Mar 14;348:g2151. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2151. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24633266 No abstract available.
-
Misinterpretation of trial evidence on statin adverse effects may harm patients.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):492-3. doi: 10.1177/2047487314533085. Epub 2014 Apr 25. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 24770566 No abstract available.
-
The concepts of 'proportions of symptoms nonpharmacological' and unmitigated failure.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):494-5. doi: 10.1177/2047487314535195. Epub 2014 May 12. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 24821731 No abstract available.
-
Lack of adverse effect of statin therapy on common muscle-related adverse events.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Aug;22(8):1066. doi: 10.1177/2047487314541732. Epub 2014 Jun 23. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 24958739 No abstract available.
-
Review: statins do not increase minor or serious symptomatic adverse events in placebo-controlled trials.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 15;161(2):JC3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-161-2-201407150-02003. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25023269 No abstract available.
-
What proportion of symptomatic side-effects in patients taking statins are genuinely caused by the drug? A response to letters.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(10):1328-30. doi: 10.1177/2047487314550805. Epub 2014 Sep 17. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25230979 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical