Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S13. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas

Review

Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas

Aubri S Hoffman et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013.

Abstract

Background: In 2005, the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration identified twelve quality dimensions to guide assessment of patient decision aids. One dimension-the delivery of patient decision aids on the Internet-is relevant when the Internet is used to provide some or all components of a patient decision aid. Building on the original background chapter, this paper provides an updated definition for this dimension, outlines a theoretical rationale, describes current evidence, and discusses emerging research areas.

Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of authors examined the relevant theoretical literature and empirical evidence through 2012.

Results: The updated definition distinguishes Internet-delivery of patient decision aids from online health information and clinical practice guidelines. Theories in cognitive psychology, decision psychology, communication, and education support the value of Internet features for providing interactive information and deliberative support. Dissemination and implementation theories support Internet-delivery for providing the right information (rapidly updated), to the right person (tailored), at the right time (the appropriate point in the decision making process). Additional efforts are needed to integrate the theoretical rationale and empirical evidence from health technology perspectives, such as consumer health informatics, user experience design, and human-computer interaction.

Conclusions: As of 2012, the updated theoretical rationale and emerging evidence suggest potential benefits to delivering patient decision aids on the Internet. However, additional research is needed to identify best practices and quality metrics for Internet-based development, evaluation, and dissemination, particularly in the areas of interactivity, multimedia components, socially-generated information, and implementation strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Elwyn G, O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Volk RJ, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T. the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;13:417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. 26. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. IPDAS Checklist for judging the quality of patient decision aids. 2006. http://ipdas.ohri.ca/resources.html
    1. Rose AS, Tosteson ANA. In: Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making. Kattan MW, editor. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009. Shared Decision Making; pp. 1036–41.
    1. Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;13:324–473.
    1. Bandura A. Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev. 1977;13:191–215. - PubMed