Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb 15;24(1):80-8.
doi: 10.11613/BM.2014.010. eCollection 2014.

Interference of medical contrast media on laboratory testing

Affiliations
Review

Interference of medical contrast media on laboratory testing

Giuseppe Lippi et al. Biochem Med (Zagreb). .

Abstract

The use of contrast media such as organic iodine molecules and gadolinium contrast agents is commonplace in diagnostic imaging. Although there is widespread perception that side effects and drug interactions may be the leading problems caused by these compounds, various degrees of interference with some laboratory tests have been clearly demonstrated. Overall, the described interference for iodinate contrast media include inappropriate gel barrier formation in blood tubes, the appearance of abnormal peaks in capillary zone electrophoresis of serum proteins, and a positive bias in assessment of cardiac troponin I with one immunoassay. The interference for gadolinium contrast agents include negative bias in calcium assessment with ortho-cresolphthalein colorimetric assays and occasional positive bias using some Arsenazo reagents, negative bias in measurement of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and zinc (colorimetric assay), as well as positive bias in creatinine (Jaffe reaction), total iron binding capacity (TIBC, ferrozine method), magnesium (calmagite reagent) and selenium (mass spectrometry) measurement. Interference has also been reported in assessment of serum indices, pulse oximetry and methaemoglobin in samples of patients receiving Patent Blue V. Under several circumstances the interference was absent from manufacturer-supplied information and limited to certain type of reagents and/or analytes, so that local verification may be advisable to establish whether or not the test in use may be biased. Since the elimination half-life of these compounds is typically lower than 2 h, blood collection after this period may be a safer alternative in patients who have received contrast media for diagnostic purposes.

Keywords: analytical interference; contrast agents; contrast media; errors; gadolinium.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic AM. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochem Med. 2010;20:126–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.014. - DOI
    1. Simundic AM, Lippi G. Preanalytical phase - A continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochem Med. 2012;22:145–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lippi G, Becan-McBride K, Behúlová D, Bowen RA, Church S, Delanghe J, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51:229–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0597. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonntag O. Quality in the analytical phase. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010;20:147–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.017. - DOI
    1. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1338–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms