Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb 15;24(1):114-22.
doi: 10.11613/BM.2014.013. eCollection 2014.

How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase?

Affiliations
Review

How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase?

Gunn B B Kristensen et al. Biochem Med (Zagreb). .

Abstract

In laboratory medicine, several studies have described the most frequent errors in the different phases of the total testing process, and a large proportion of these errors occur in the pre-analytical phase. Schemes for registration of errors and subsequent feedback to the participants have been conducted for decades concerning the analytical phase by External Quality Assessment (EQA) organizations operating in most countries. The aim of the paper is to present an overview of different types of EQA schemes for the pre-analytical phase, and give examples of some existing schemes. So far, very few EQA organizations have focused on the pre-analytical phase, and most EQA organizations do not offer pre-analytical EQA schemes (EQAS). It is more difficult to perform and standardize pre-analytical EQAS and also, accreditation bodies do not ask the laboratories for results from such schemes. However, some ongoing EQA programs for the pre-analytical phase do exist, and some examples are given in this paper. The methods used can be divided into three different types; collecting information about pre-analytical laboratory procedures, circulating real samples to collect information about interferences that might affect the measurement procedure, or register actual laboratory errors and relate these to quality indicators. These three types have different focus and different challenges regarding implementation, and a combination of the three is probably necessary to be able to detect and monitor the wide range of errors occurring in the pre-analytical phase.

Keywords: external quality assessment; pre-analytical; quality assurance, health care; quality indicators, health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blumenthal D. The errors of our way. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1305. - PubMed
    1. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002;48:691–8. - PubMed
    1. Lapworth R, Teal TK. Laboratory blunders revisited. Ann Clin Biochem. 1994;31:78–84. - PubMed
    1. Nutting PA, Main DS, Fischer PM, Stull TM, Pontious M, Seifert M, Jr, et al. Toward optimal laboratory use. Problems in laboratory testing in primary care. JAMA. 1996;275:635–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530320059035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Kane M. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:28–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.023. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms