Choice of vein-harvest technique for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the REGROUP trial
- PMID: 24633760
- PMCID: PMC6649498
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.22267
Choice of vein-harvest technique for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the REGROUP trial
Abstract
The Randomized Endo-vein Graft Prospective (REGROUP) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01850082) is a randomized, intent-to-treat, 2-arm, parallel-design, multicenter study funded by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP No. 588) of the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Cardiac surgeons at 16 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers with technical expertise in performing both endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) and open vein harvesting (OVH) were recruited as the REGROUP surgeon participants. Subjects requiring elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass with use of ≥1 saphenous vein graft will be screened for enrollment using pre-established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Enrolled subjects (planned N = 1150) will be randomized to 1 of the 2 arms (EVH or OVH) after an experienced vein harvester has been assigned. The primary outcomes measure is the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. Subject assessments will be performed at multiple times, including at baseline, intraoperatively, postoperatively, and at discharge (or 30 days after surgery, if still hospitalized). Assessment of leg-wound complications will be completed at 6 weeks after surgery. Telephone follow-ups will occur at 3-month intervals after surgery until the participating sites are decommissioned after the trial's completion (approximately 4.5 years after the full study startup). To assess long-term outcomes, centralized follow-up of MACE for 2 additional years will be centrally performed using VA and non-VA clinical and administrative databases. The primary MACE outcome will be compared between the 2 arms, EVH and OVH, at the end of the trial duration.
Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
References
-
- Sipahi I, Akay H, Dagdelen S, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long‐term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease. Meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era. JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Peterson ED. Innovation and comparative‐effectiveness research in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1897–1899. - PubMed
-
- Bitondo JM, Dagget WM, Torchiana DF, et al. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: a comparison of postoperative wound complications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:523–528. - PubMed
-
- Lumsden AB, Eaves FF, Ofenloch JC, et al. Subcutaneous, video‐assisted saphenous vein harvest: report of the first 30 cases. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;4:771–776. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
