Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar 15;20(6):1419-27.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0091.

Developing precision medicine in a global world

Affiliations
Review

Developing precision medicine in a global world

Eric H Rubin et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Advances in understanding the biology of cancer, as well as advances in diagnostic technologies, such as the advent of affordable high-resolution DNA sequencing, have had a major impact on the approach to identification of specific alterations in a given patient's cancer that could be used as a basis for treatment selection, and hence the development of companion diagnostics. Although there are now several examples of successful development of companion diagnostics that allow identification of patients who will achieve the greatest benefit from a new therapeutic, the path to coapproval of a diagnostic test along with a new therapeutic is complex and often inefficient. This review and the accompanying articles examine the current state of companion diagnostic development in the United States and Europe from academic, industry, regulatory, and economic perspectives. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, "The Precision Medicine Conundrum: Approaches to Companion Diagnostic Co-development."

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Eric Rubin is a full-time employee of Merck Research Laboratories. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest with regard to the content of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of correlation between tumor biomarker expression and drug-induced reduction in tumor burden. Examples of two cutoff selections for test-positive versus test-negative are shown (A and B), with different implications for false-positive and false-negative rates, as well as differences in percent of patients who are deemed to be test-positive.

References

    1. Gown AM. Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2008;21 Suppl 2:S8–S15. - PubMed
    1. Fitzgibbons PL, Murphy DA, Hammond ME, Allred DC, Valenstein PN. Recommendations for validating estrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:930–5. - PubMed
    1. Allred DC, Carlson RW, Berry DA, Burstein HJ, Edge SB, Goldstein LJ, et al. NCCN Task Force Report: Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7 Suppl 6:S1–S21; quiz S2–3. - PubMed
    1. Raman G, Wallace B, Patel K, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Update on Horizon Scans of Genetic Tests Currently Available for Clinical Use in Cancers. Technology Assessment Report. Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center 2011. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/DeterminationProcess/downloads/id81... - PubMed
    1. Parkinson DR, McCormack RT, Keating SM. Evidence of Clinical Utility: An Unmet Need in Molecular Diagnostics for Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2014. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources