Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;10(1):105-127.
doi: 10.1007/s11292-013-9187-y.

Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders: a research note

Affiliations

Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders: a research note

Michael Chaple et al. J Exp Criminol. 2014.

Abstract

Objectives: Despite evidence that treatment is effective in reducing recidivism among inmates with substance use problems, scarce resources mean that few of those in need of treatment actually receive it. Computerized substance abuse interventions could be used to expand access to treatment in prisons without placing an undue burden on resources. The major aim of the study was to compare treatment conditions in terms of their service utilization, skills acquisition, and treatment satisfaction.

Methods: The study recruited men and women with substance use disorders from 10 prisons in 4 states. In an open label clinical trial, 494 subjects were randomly assigned either to the Experimental condition, a computerized drug treatment intervention, the Therapeutic Education System (TES; n = 249), or to the Control condition, Standard Care (n = 245). Chi-square tests compared groups on categorical variables and independent samples t tests were used for interval level continuous variables.

Results: Initial evidence demonstrated: (1) comparable group rates of session attendance and high rates of TES module completion for experimental subjects; (2) comparable group gains in the development of coping skills; and (3) a more favorable view of TES than of Standard Care.

Conclusions: Collectively, these results show that a computerized intervention, such as TES, can be implemented successfully in prison. Given the barriers to the delivery of substance abuse treatment typically encountered in correctional settings, computerized interventions have the potential to fill a significant treatment gap and are particularly well suited to inmates with mild to moderate substance use disorders who often are not treated.

Keywords: Computerized intervention; Correctional settings; Offenders; Substance abuse treatment; Substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-IV-TR. 4. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association, Task Force on DSM-IV; 2000.
    1. Arriola KRJ, Kennedy SS, Coltharp JC, Braithwaite RL, Hammett TM, Tinsley MJ. Development and implementation of the cross-site evaluation of the CDC/HRSA corrections demonstration project. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2002;14(Suppl A):107–118. doi: 10.1521/aeap.14.4.107.23883. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belenko S, Peugh J. Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2005;77(3):269–281. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bickel WK, Christensen DR, Marsch LA. A review of computer-based interventions used in the assessment, treatment and research of drug addiction. Substance Use & Misuse. 2011;46(1):4–9. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.521066. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Buchhalter AR, Badger GJ. Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2008;16(2):132–143. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.2.132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources