Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 1;8(5):455-462.
doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.01.004.

Thematic Matching as Remedial Teaching for Symbolic Matching for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Affiliations

Thematic Matching as Remedial Teaching for Symbolic Matching for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Karen M Lionello-Denolf et al. Res Autism Spectr Disord. .

Abstract

Matching-to-sample (MTS) is often used to teach symbolic relationships between spoken or printed words and their referents to children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. However, many children have difficulty learning symbolic matching, even though they may demonstrate generalized identity matching. The current study investigated whether training on symbolic MTS tasks in which the stimuli are physically dissimilar but members of familiar categories (i.e., thematic matching) can remediate an individual's difficulty learning symbolic MTS tasks involving non-representative stimuli. Three adolescent males diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder were first trained on symbolic MTS tasks with unfamiliar, non-representative form stimuli. Thematic matching was introduced after the participants failed to learn 0, 2 or 4 symbolic MTS tasks and before additional symbolic MTS tasks were introduced. After exposure to thematic matching, accuracy on symbolic MTS tasks with novel stimuli increased to above chance for all participants. For two participants, high accuracy (> 90%) was achieved on a majority of these sessions. Thus, thematic matching may be an effective intervention for students with limited verbal repertoires and who have difficulty learning symbolic MTS tasks. Possible explanations for the facilitative effect of thematic matching are considered and warrant further investigation.

Keywords: children with ASD; matching-to-sample; symbolic behavior; thematic matching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of the form stimuli used in symbolic matching (stimulus set 1) and the clip-art stimuli used in thematic matching (stimulus set 3).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Accuracy for each training session for individual participants. The dashed horizontal line at 50% correct indicates chance matching accuracy and the dashed vertical line indicates the introduction of thematic matching. Separate matching tasks within each condition are indicated by “T” for thematic matching and “S” for symbolic matching. The specific stimulus sets used for each thematic task (e.g., T1) were the same across participants; the stimulus sets used for each symbolic task differed across participants.

References

    1. Barnes D. Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record. 1994;44:91–124.
    1. Boesch MC, Wendt O, Subramanian A, Hsu N. Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating devince: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2013;7:480–493. - PubMed
    1. Bondy AS, Frost LA. The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior. 1994;9:1–19.
    1. Carter DE, Eckerman DA. Symbolic matching by pigeons: Rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations. Science. 1975;187:662–664. - PubMed
    1. Clark KM, Green G. Comparison of two procedures for teaching dictated-word/symbol relations to learners with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2004;37:503–507. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources