Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 20;2013(Suppl 9):006.
doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.S9-006.

Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics

Affiliations

Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics

Yureeda Qazi et al. J Clin Cell Immunol. .

Abstract

Corneal transplantation is among the most successful solid organ transplants. However, despite low rejection rates of grafts in the 'low-risk' setting, rejection can be as high as 70% when grafted into 'high-risk' recipient beds. Under normal homeostatic conditions, the avascular cornea provides a unique environment that facilitates immune and angiogenic privilege. An imbalance in pro-inflammatory, angiogenic and lymphangiogenic mediators leads to a breakdown in corneal immune privilege with a consequent host response against the donor graft. Recent developments in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties have reduced the rates of graft rejection even more, while providing improved visual outcomes. The corneal layer against which an immune response is initiated, largely determines reversibility of the acute episode. While epithelial and stromal graft rejection may be treated with topical corticosteroids with higher success, acute endothelial rejection mandates a more aggressive approach to therapy due to the lack of regenerative capacity of this layer. However, current immunosuppressive regimens come with the caveat of ocular and systemic side effects, making prolonged aggressive treatment undesirable. With the advent of biologics, efficacious therapies with a superior side effect profile are on the horizon. In our review we discuss the mediators of ocular immune privilege, the roles of cellular and molecular immune players in graft rejection, with a focus on human leukocyte antigen and antigen presenting cells. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical risk factors for graft rejection and compare rates of rejection in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties to traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Lastly, we present the current and upcoming measures of therapeutic strategies to manage and treat graft rejection, including an overview of biologics and small molecule therapy.

Keywords: Allograft rejection; Angiogenesis; Antigen presenting cells; Human leukocyte antigen; Immune privilege; Immune suppression; Keratoplasty; Lymphangiogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Streilein JW, Yamada J, Dana MR, Ksander BR. Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation, ocular immune privilege, and orthotopic corneal allografts. Transplant Proc. 1999;31:1472–1475. - PubMed
    1. Faraj LA, Hashmani K, Khatib T, Al-Aqaba M, Dua HS. The changing face of corneal graft rejection. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1049–1050. - PubMed
    1. EBAA. Protecting Sight Worldwide- 2013 EBAA Year in Review. Washington, DC: Moire Marketing Partners; 2013. p. 42.
    1. Niederkorn JY. High-risk corneal allografts and why they lose their immune privilege. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10:493–497. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CCTS) Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1392–1403. - PubMed