Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 31:2012:6290716.
doi: 10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290716.

Toward Onboard Estimation of Physiological Phase for an Epicardial Crawling Robot

Affiliations

Toward Onboard Estimation of Physiological Phase for an Epicardial Crawling Robot

Nathan A Wood et al. Proc IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatron. .

Abstract

HeartLander is a miniature mobile robot which adheres to and crawls over the surface of the beating heart to provide therapies in a minimally invasive manner. Although HeartLander inherently provides a stable operating platform, the motion of the surface of the heart remains an important factor in the operation of the robot. The quasi-periodic motion of the heart due to physiological cycles, respiration and the heartbeat, affects the ability of the robot to move, as well as localize accurately. In order to improve locomotion efficiency, as well as register different locations on the heart in physiological phase, two methods of identifying physiological phases are presented: sliding-window-based and model-based. In the sliding-window-based approach a vector of previous measurements is compared to previously learned motion templates to determine the current physiological phases, while the model-based approach learns a Fourier series model of the motion, and uses this model to estimate the current physiological phases using an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). The two methods, while differing in approach, produce similarly accurate results on data recorded from animal experiments in vivo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The HeartLander robot.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Position data of the HeartLander robot on the surface of the heart and (b) ground truth physiological phase values.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency analysis of heart deformation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Using the ground truth phase labels the respiration and cardiac motion may be isolated and separated.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Example of sliding window vector extraction.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Representative results of (a) model-free and (b) model-based results. Respiration phase is shown in the upper plots while cardiac phase is shown in the lower plots. The ground truth values are shown in blue and red respectively, while the predicted values are in green. Error is shown in black.

References

    1. Falk V, Diegler A, Walther T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW. Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000 Nov;15:378–387. - PubMed
    1. Bebek O, Cavusoglu M. Intelligent control algorithms for robotic-assisted beating heart surgery. IEEE Trans Robot. 2007 Jun;23(3):468–480.
    1. Cuvillon L, Gangloff J, de Mathelin M, Forgione A. Toward robotized beating heart TECABG: Assessment of the heart dynamics using high-speed vision. Comput Aided Surg. 2006 Sep;11(5):267–277. - PubMed
    1. Yuen SG, Kettler DT, Novotny PM, Plowes RD, Howe RD. Robotic motion compensation for beating heart intracardiac surgery. Int J Rob Res. 2009 Oct;28(10):1355–1372. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patronik N, Ota T, Zenati M, Riviere C. A miniature mobile robot for navigation and positioning on the beating heart. IEEE Trans Robot. 2009 Oct;25(5):1109–1124. - PMC - PubMed