High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock
- PMID: 24635770
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312173
High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock
Abstract
Background: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends targeting a mean arterial pressure of at least 65 mm Hg during initial resuscitation of patients with septic shock. However, whether this blood-pressure target is more or less effective than a higher target is unknown.
Methods: In a multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 776 patients with septic shock to undergo resuscitation with a mean arterial pressure target of either 80 to 85 mm Hg (high-target group) or 65 to 70 mm Hg (low-target group). The primary end point was mortality at day 28.
Results: At 28 days, there was no significant between-group difference in mortality, with deaths reported in 142 of 388 patients in the high-target group (36.6%) and 132 of 388 patients in the low-target group (34.0%) (hazard ratio in the high-target group, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.38; P=0.57). There was also no significant difference in mortality at 90 days, with 170 deaths (43.8%) and 164 deaths (42.3%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.30; P=0.74). The occurrence of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (74 events [19.1%] and 69 events [17.8%], respectively; P=0.64). However, the incidence of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation was higher in the high-target group than in the low-target group. Among patients with chronic hypertension, those in the high-target group required less renal-replacement therapy than did those in the low-target group, but such therapy was not associated with a difference in mortality.
Conclusions: Targeting a mean arterial pressure of 80 to 85 mm Hg, as compared with 65 to 70 mm Hg, in patients with septic shock undergoing resuscitation did not result in significant differences in mortality at either 28 or 90 days. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; SEPSISPAM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01149278.).
Comment in
-
Is there a good MAP for septic shock?N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1649-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1402066. Epub 2014 Mar 18. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24635771 No abstract available.
-
High versus low blood-pressure target in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):283-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1406276. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 25014694 No abstract available.
-
High versus low blood-pressure target in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):282. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1406276. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 25014695 No abstract available.
-
High versus low blood-pressure target in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):282-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1406276. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 25014696 No abstract available.
-
High versus low blood-pressure target in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1406276. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 25014697 No abstract available.
-
In septic shock, MAP targets of 80 to 85 mm Hg vs 65 to 70 mm Hg did not differ for 28-day mortality.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 15;161(2):JC7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-161-2-201407150-02007. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25023273 No abstract available.
-
[Comments on: Target value of mean arterial blood pressure in patients with septic shock].Anaesthesist. 2014 Sep;63(8-9):697-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2366-z. Anaesthesist. 2014. PMID: 25096069 German. No abstract available.
-
Bosentan for sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension, age-adjusted D-dimer levels in pulmonary embolism, and mean arterial blood pressure targets in septic shock.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct 15;190(8):948-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1305RR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 25317464 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical