Is expert opinion reliable when estimating transition probabilities? The case of HCV-related cirrhosis in Egypt
- PMID: 24635942
- PMCID: PMC4003824
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-39
Is expert opinion reliable when estimating transition probabilities? The case of HCV-related cirrhosis in Egypt
Abstract
Background: Data on HCV-related cirrhosis progression are scarce in developing countries in general, and in Egypt in particular. The objective of this study was to estimate the probability of death and transition between different health stages of HCV (compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma) for an Egyptian population of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis.
Methods: We used the "elicitation of expert opinions" method to obtain collective knowledge from a panel of 23 Egyptian experts (among whom 17 were hepatologists or gastroenterologists and 2 were infectiologists). The questionnaire was based on virtual medical cases and asked the experts to assess probability of death or probability of various cirrhosis complications. The design was a Delphi study: we attempted to obtain a consensus between experts via a series of questionnaires interspersed with group response feedback.
Results: We found substantial disparity between experts' answers, and no consensus was reached at the end of the process. Moreover, we obtained high death probability and high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. The annual transition probability to death was estimated at between 10.1% and 61.5% and the annual probability of occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma was estimated at between 16.8% and 58.9% (depending on age, gender, time spent in cirrhosis and cirrhosis severity).
Conclusions: Our results show that eliciting expert opinions is not suited for determining the natural history of diseases due to practitioners' difficulties in evaluating quantities. Cognitive bias occurring during this type of study might explain our results.
Figures



References
-
- Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
-
- Dalkey NC, Helmer-Hirschberg O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Rand Corp: Santa Monica, Calif; 1962.
-
- Deville W, Greacen T, Bogic M, Dauvrin M, Dias S, Gaddini A, Jensen NK, Karamanidou C, Kluge U, Mertaniemi R, I Riera RP, Sarvary A, Soares JJ, Stankunas M, Strassmayr C, Welbel M, Priebe S. Health care for immigrants in Europe: is there still consensus among country experts about principles of good practice? A Delphi study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:699. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-699. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lubell Y, Staedke SG, Greenwood BM, Kamya MR, Molyneux M, Newton PN, Reyburn H, Snow RW, D'alessandro U, English M, Day N, Kremsner P, Dondorp A, Mbacham W, Dorsey G, Owusu-Agyei S, Maitland K, Krishna S, Newton C, Pasvol G, Taylor T, Von Seidlein L, White NJ, Binka F, Mills A, Whitty CJ. Likely health outcomes for untreated acute febrile illness in the tropics in decision and economic models; a Delphi survey. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical