Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;101(5):1308-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.050. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders

Hakan Cakmak  1 , Nam D Tran  1 , A Musa Zamah  1 , Marcelle I Cedars  1 , Mitchell P Rosen  2
Affiliations

A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders

Hakan Cakmak et al. Fertil Steril. 2014 May.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether delaying the start of ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist improves ovarian response in poor responders.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Academic medical center.

Patient(s): Thirty patients, who responded poorly and did not get pregnant with conventional estrogen priming antagonist IVF protocol.

Intervention(s): Delayed-start antagonist protocol (estrogen priming followed by early follicular-phase GnRH antagonist treatment for 7 days before ovarian stimulation).

Main outcome measure(s): Number of dominant follicles and mature oocytes retrieved, mature oocyte yield, and fertilization rate.

Result(s): The number of patients who met the criteria to proceed to oocyte retrieval was significantly higher in the delayed-start protocol [21/30 (70%)] compared with the previous conventional estrogen priming antagonist cycle [11/30 (36.7%)]. The number of dominant follicles was significantly higher in the delayed-start (4.2 ± 2.7) compared with conventional (2.4 ± 1.3) protocol. In patients who had oocyte retrieval after both protocols (n = 9), the delayed start resulted in shorter ovarian stimulation (9.4 ± 1.4 days vs. 11.1 ± 2.0 days), higher number of mature oocytes retrieved (4.9 ± 2.0 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1), and a trend toward increased fertilization rates with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI; 86 ± 17% vs. 69 ± 21%) compared with conventional protocol. After delayed start, the average number of embryos transferred was 2.8 ± 1.4 with implantation rate of 9.8% and clinical pregnancy rate of 23.8%.

Conclusion(s): The delayed-start protocol improves ovarian response in poor responders by promoting and synchronizing follicle development without impairing oocyte developmental competence.

Keywords: Delayed start; controlled ovarian stimulation; poor responder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outline of conventional estrogen priming and delayed start antagonist COS protocols.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of percent of cycles met the criteria to proceed to oocyte retrieval in conventional and delayed start COS cycles. * p=0.016.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BC. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr Rev. 2006;27:170–207. - PubMed
    1. Biljan MM, Buckett WM, Dean N, Phillips SJ, Tan SL. The outcome of IVF-embryo transfer treatment in patients who develop three follicles or less. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2140–4. - PubMed
    1. Hendriks DJ, te Velde ER, Looman CW, Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ. Expected poor ovarian response in predicting cumulative pregnancy rates: a powerful tool. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:727–36. - PubMed
    1. Saldeen P, Kallen K, Sundstrom P. The probability of successful IVF outcome after poor ovarian response. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:457–61. - PubMed
    1. Ulug U, Ben-Shlomo I, Turan E, Erden HF, Akman MA, Bahceci M. Conception rates following assisted reproduction in poor responder patients: a retrospective study in 300 consecutive cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:439–43. - PubMed

Substances