Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 17;369(1641):20130205.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0205. Print 2014 May 5.

Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load

Affiliations

Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load

Nilli Lavie et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

What is the relationship between attention and conscious awareness? Awareness sometimes appears to be restricted to the contents of focused attention, yet at other times irrelevant distractors will dominate awareness. This contradictory relationship has also been reflected in an abundance of discrepant research findings leading to an enduring controversy in cognitive psychology. Lavie's load theory of attention suggests that the puzzle can be solved by considering the role of perceptual load. Although distractors will intrude upon awareness in conditions of low load, awareness will be restricted to the content of focused attention when the attended information involves high perceptual load. Here, we review recent evidence for this proposal with an emphasis on the various subjective blindness phenomena, and their neural correlates, induced by conditions of high perceptual load. We also present novel findings that clarify the role of attention in the response to stimulus contrast. Overall, this article demonstrates a critical role for perceptual load across the spectrum of perceptual processes leading to awareness, from the very early sensory responses related to contrast detection to explicit recognition of semantic content.

Keywords: attention; change blindness; conscious visual awareness; contrast response function; inattentional blindness; perceptual load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the experiment procedures (a,b) and results (c) from [13]. This figure illustrates a load manipulation in which the task varies but the stimuli are identical (a) or the set size of heterogeneous items is increased in a random subset of the trials (b) across low and high loads. A critical stimulus is added on the last trial. Both load (black bars, low load; white bars, high load) manipulations led to a substantial reduction in awareness reports for this stimulus (c). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Perceptual load and the CRF. (a) Example of high-load displays. (b) Psychometric functions for low- (black curve) and high- (grey curve) perceptual load. The estimated contrast threshold parameter for each psychometric function is also shown in dashed vertical lines (contrast threshold yielding half-maximum performance). Each data point represents the mean across participants. Error bars are ±1 s.e.m.

References

    1. Neisser U. 1979. The control of information pickup in selective looking. In Perception and its development: a tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (ed. Pick AD.), pp. 201–219. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    1. Gray JA, Wedderburn AAI. 1960. Shorter articles and notes grouping strategies with simultaneous stimuli. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 12, 180–184. (10.1080/17470216008416722) - DOI
    1. Moray N. 1959. Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 11, 56–60. (10.1080/17470215908416289) - DOI
    1. Deutsch JA, Deutsch D. 1963. Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychol. Rev. 70, 80 (10.1037/h0039515) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Treisman A, Geffen G. 1967. Selective attention: perception or response? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 19, 1–17. (10.1080/14640746708400062) - DOI - PubMed