Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome
- PMID: 24639594
- PMCID: PMC3955392
- DOI: 10.1086/669706
Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome
Abstract
Do intellectual property (IP) rights on existing technologies hinder subsequent innovation? Using newly-collected data on the sequencing of the human genome by the public Human Genome Project and the private firm Celera, this paper estimates the impact of Celera's gene-level IP on subsequent scientific research and product development. Genes initially sequenced by Celera were held with IP for up to two years, but moved into the public domain once re-sequenced by the public effort. Across a range of empirical specifications, I find evidence that Celera's IP led to reductions in subsequent scientific research and product development on the order of 20 to 30 percent. Taken together, these results suggest that Celera's short-term IP had persistent negative effects on subsequent innovation relative to a counterfactual of Celera genes having always been in the public domain.
Figures
References
-
- Aghion Philippe, Dewatripont Mathias, Stein Jeremy. Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND Journal of Economics. 2008;39(3):617–635.
-
- Anand Bharat, Khanna Tarun. The structure of licensing contracts. Journal of Industrial Economics. 2000;48(1):103–135.
-
- Arrow Kenneth. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson Richard., editor. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press; 1962.
-
- Bessen James. Holdup and licensing of cumulative innovations with private information. Economics Letters. 2004;82(3):321–326.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources